Skip to main content

Pope Francis's Judas-like Betrayal of Chinese Catholics has First Victim: Bishop Guo Xijin Kidnapped then Released by Police & now Banned from saying Mass by Regime

It seems fitting that in Holy Week the first Chinese Christ-like victim is send to his Calvary by Pope Francis's partner, the Chinese Communist regime, in the papal Judas-like betray of the Chinese Catholics.

Sadly, Francis's partnership is the right word because without his approval none of this could be happening.

Today, Asia News reported:

Underground Bishop of "Mindong, Msgr. [Vincent] Guo Xijin kidnapped by [Chinese Communist] police before Easter... after refusing to concelebrate during these Easter holidays with illegitimate bishop Zhan Silu... one of seven illegitimate and excommunicated bishops awaiting reconciliation with the Pope" due to his papal diplomatic action. (AsiaNews.it, "Mindong, Msgr. Guo Xijin kidnapped by the police before Easter," March 27, 2017)

Chinese Cardinal Joseph Zen asked the following question about Francis's diplomatic action:

"[T]oday would our diplomats advise Joseph to go and humbly beg for dialogue with Herod?"

The papal answer is apparently yes.

As a commenter on the Catholic Monitor with the tag of Jac said:

"I would compare this evil deed of the Pope towards the Chinese Catholics to the kissing by Judas."

"I am ashamed that nobody among the high ranking Cardinals has dared to protest."

-Update March 28, 2018-

Bishop Msgr. Guo Xijin was released by Chinese Communist police and now" [p]olice have banned him from celebrating Mass as bishop." (AsiaNews.it, " Mindong, Msgr. Guo is back, but banned from celebrating Mass as bishop," March 28, 2018)

Say a Our Father now for the suffering Chinese Catholics and Bishop Guo Xijin as well as that every person on earth with a shred of decency cry out against this profoundly immoral "diplomatic" action of Pope Francis and Cardinal Parolin.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk