They'll Call You Racist..."Rousseau...believe[d] civilization is the disease" & Leo's Vatican?: "Fortin’s critique...By shifting the locus of human failure from internal moral disorder (sin...) to external structural conditions (society...), Rousseau effectively secularized the concept of redemption"
The Alpha Path: "They'll Call You Racist For Watching This" on YouTube
"Jean-Jacques Rousseau argued that civilization itself was the problem. That man was born pure and society corrupted him. Thus began the myth of the noble savage. The idea that the less civilized a people were, the more authentic and virtuous they must be. It was nonsense then and its nonsense now. But the west ate it up. That became the foundation for everything that followed. See, once you believe civilization is the disease, then the civilization that built the most, Christianity, becomes the greatest villain." - The Alpha Path
Is Fr. Ernest Fortin describing Leo's Vatican?:
Google AI overview of Fortin's essay "Natural Law and Social Justice"
- The Classical View: Structural injustice is aggregate personal sin. You fix the structure by reforming the souls who inhabit and run it.
- The Modern/Rousseauian View: Personal vice is a byproduct of bad structures. You fix the soul by tearing down and rebuilding the institution.
Yes. Fr. Ernest Fortin directly critiques a Rousseauian view very close to what you described.
Fortin argues that Rousseau fundamentally reformulated the human problem as a conflict between “nature” and “history” or society, replacing the older classical-Christian framework of body and soul. In Fortin's account, the consequence is significant: if society and its institutions are regarded as the primary sources of human corruption, then changing society takes precedence over changing the individual.
That connects closely to your point about the “noble savage,” but Fortin's critique goes deeper than simply saying Rousseau romanticized primitive peoples.
Fortin's basic objection
For Fortin, the classical-Christian position is roughly:
Human beings are morally responsible → moral disorder is rooted in human beings → therefore reform must include personal moral reform.
The Rousseauian reversal becomes:
Human beings are naturally good → social arrangements corrupt them → therefore reform the social arrangements.
Fortin explicitly connects this development with the later idea that “the only true evil is social evil” and that the only sin is effectively “social sin.”
And Fortin's critique of Rousseau's conception of conscience is particularly relevant. He rejects the idea that conscience is merely an internalized product of society or a feeling superior to reason. For Fortin, conscience presupposes rational principles that are naturally knowable and universally valid.
So Fortin would give you a stronger formulation of your argument:
Rousseau does not merely criticize particular civilizations. He changes the location of the human problem.
In the classical Christian account, the disordered human person needs conversion, virtue, and grace. In the Rousseauian framework Fortin criticizes, the fundamental problem increasingly becomes the social environment, which encourages the conclusion that changing institutions can accomplish what earlier Christianity understood as requiring moral and spiritual transformation.
That is also why Fortin is useful for understanding your earlier statement about Christianity. He isn't simply defending “Western civilization” as a collection of institutions. His deeper concern is that modernity can make social structures carry a burden that classical Christianity placed on the moral formation of the person.
And this is very much part of Fortin's broader critique of modernity: scholarship on him describes his work as an examination of modernity's “moral amnesia,” including his defense of Christianity, reason, and the classical understanding of moral responsibility.
If you want to pursue this particular thread, Fortin's “Natural Law and Social Justice” is probably the most directly relevant essay.
- Book Title: Classical Christianity and the Political Order: Reflections on the Theologico-Political Problem (Ernest Fortin: Collected Essays, Volume 2), edited by J. Brian Benestad.
- Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield (1996).
- Location in Book: Chapter 11 (Pages 223–242). [1, 2, 3]
- Academic Databases: If you have institutional access (like a university library), you can download the original PDF directly via HeinOnline or Oxford Academic by searching the journal archive for The American Journal of Jurisprudence, Vol. 30. [1, 2]
- Physical & Digital Bookstores: You can find the collected essays volume on platforms like Amazon or independent sellers like Third Place Books. [1, 2]
- Digital Libraries: Snippets, citations, and full-text scans are often indexed across research repositories such as Google Books or Academia.edu. [1]
I ask all The Catholic Monitor readers to also pray for the end of this war. Watch "Trump Calls Putin To Get Iran War Offramp! w/ Scott Ritter" on YouTube: ...Read more Please Pray for Trump to end the Iran War: Watch "Trump Calls Putin To Get Iran War Offramp! w/ Scott Ritter" on YouTubeFranklin & Graham calls on Christians to pray for 'end to the bloodshed' ahead of Trump-Putin summit...7mo
|
Conclave Notes:
-- Open letter urges Pope Leo XIV to correct ‘scandalous incoherence’ in Amoris Laetitia...[Wow! Even notorious Popesplainer Fr.] Harrison warns that Pope Francis taught a ‘dangerous self-contradiction’ on Communion for the divorced and ‘remarried,’ petitioning Pope Leo to correct the record. [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2025/08/open-letter-urges-pope-leo-xiv-to.html]
-- Are the Cardinals who will participate in the upcoming conclave authentically appointed & morally justified in voting, or will the shadow of Francis's possible illegitimacy cast itself over the next papacy? [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2025/04/are-cardinals-who-will-participate-in.html]
-- 5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/06/5-dubia-questions-for-steve-skojec.html]
Francis Notes:
l– Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:
“[T]he Pope… WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See.”
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)
Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said “the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church.”
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]
– “If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html
– “Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?”: http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html
– If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the”Roman Rite Communities” like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & “Eminent Canonists and Theologians” by “Resist[ing]” him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html
– LifeSiteNews, “Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers,” December 4, 2017:
The AAS guidelines explicitly allows “sexually active adulterous couples facing ‘complex circumstances’ to ‘access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'”
– On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:
“The AAS statement… establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense.”
– On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:
“Francis’ heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents.”
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.
Election Notes:
– Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: “212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted…Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden” [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]
– Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times “Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003”: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html
– Tucker Carlson’s Conservatism Inc. Biden Steal Betrayal is explained by “One of the Greatest Columns ever Written” according to Rush: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/tucker-carlsons-conservatism-inc-biden.html?m=1
– A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020:
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1
What is needed right now to save America from those who would destroy our God given rights is to pray at home or in church and if called to even go to outdoor prayer rallies in every town and city across the United States for God to pour out His grace on our country to save us from those who would use a Reichstag Fire-like incident to destroy our civil liberties. [Is the [J6] DC Capitol Incident Comparable to the Nazi Reichstag Fire Incident where the German People Lost their Civil Liberties?: http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/is-dc-capital-incident-comparable-to.html?m=1 and Epoch Times Show Crossroads on Capitol Incident: “Anitfa ‘Agent Provocateurs‘”:
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1]
Pray an Our Father now for the grace to know God’s Will and to do it.
Pray an Our Father now for America.
Comments