Skip to main content

"Francis does not follow or advocate for any heretical views, nor did he adopt the specific condemned theories of Pico della Mirandola.When the modern Vatican references Pico della Mirandola (such as in the 2024 doctrinal document Dignitas Infinita), it is drawing strictly upon his highly celebrated concept of human dignity and free will from his Oration"

Google AI overview:
Pope Francis does not follow or advocate for any heretical views, nor did he adopt the specific condemned theories of Pico della Mirandola.
When the modern Vatican references Pico della Mirandola (such as in the 2024 doctrinal document Dignitas Infinita), it is drawing strictly upon his highly celebrated concept of human dignity and free will from his Oration. The Church separate those mainstream philosophical ideas from the highly specific theological claims that got Pico into trouble with the Renaissance papacy. [1, 2, 3]
In 1487, Pope Innocent VIII condemned 13 specific propositions out of Pico’s 900 Theses. The specific "heretical" or heterodox views Pico was accused of holding include: [1, 2]
  • Universalism (Temporary Hell): Pico famously argued that "a mortal sin of finite duration is not deserving of eternal but only of temporal punishment." This directly contradicted the Catholic dogma of eternal damnation. [1]
  • The Inclusion of Magic and Kabbalah: Pico argued that Jewish Kabbalah and "natural magic" were the ultimate tools for proving the divinity of Christ. The Church strongly condemned this mix of Christian theology with esoteric and occult practices. [1, 2]
  • Origenism: Pico defended the early Church writer Origen of Alexandria, arguing it was more reasonable to believe Origen was saved rather than damned. Origen's ideas on the ultimate reconciliation of all souls had already been condemned centuries prior.
  • The Nature of the Eucharist: He proposed highly technical, non-traditional scholastic explanations for how Christ becomes present in the bread and wine, which the papal commission flagged as erroneous.
Ultimately, Pico later submitted an Apologia clarifying his loyalty to Catholic dogma, and Pope Alexander VI formally cleared him of all heresy charges in 1493. [1, 2]
When Pope Francis or modern theologians cite Pico today, they are referencing his orthodoxy-approved thesis: that God uniquely granted humans free will to shape their own path. [1, 2]
If you'd like to dive deeper, let me know:
  • Would you like to read the exact text of how the Vatican frames Pico's ideas in Dignitas Infinita?
  • Are you interested in the political drama between Pico, the Medici family, and the Popes that led to his arrest? [1, 2]

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more