Skip to main content

ABP. VIGANO: "TO BELIEVE THAT THE DEATH OF BERGOGLIO CAN MAKE US SIMPLY FORGET EVERYTHING AND ALLOW US TO TURN THE PAGE WITHOUT DOING ANYTHING,WOULD BE A VERY SERIOUS ERROR "

Interviewed by a New York Times journalist, I answered two questions on current issues, which however were not published. I report them below, in two separate posts. _________ 1. What is the state of the American church right now? What was the lasting impact of your 2018 letter
Image
2. How are those who have opposed the direction Pope Francis has taken the church working to correct course? What, if anything, is being done to make sure the next Pontiff will not repeat what many see as Francis's shortcomings? Or is that futile?   Many think they can simply close the Bergoglian parenthesis by electing a pope who is “conservative” but who does not question the Second Vatican Council and its disastrous reforms, such as Cardinal Raymond Burke or Cardinal Robert Sarah. But hoping this will happen is truly a “Mission Impossible,” given that 110 cardinals out of 138 cardinals have been created by Bergoglio precisely to “shield” the Bergoglian synodal revolution and guarantee that it continues.   Those who enter the Conclave thinking they only need to plug a few holes while continuing on a course that has proven to be a disaster – I am referring to the conciliar revolution – will not obtain any lasting results. There are now sixty years of errors and horrors that need to be completely reset: a titanic task, which only divine intervention can make possible.   Bergoglio’s usurpation – which I have denounced and which has earned me “excommunication” – undermines the legitimacy of the Cardinals he has created in these twelve years and the validity of the election of any Successor. This is why an operation of transparency and justice is needed before proceeding to convene a Conclave. To believe that the death of Bergoglio can make us simply forget everything and allow us to turn the page without doing anything,would be a very serious error and a betrayal of the mandate that Our Lord gave to the Apostles and their Successors.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...