Skip to main content

@laralogan STATEMENT FROM JAN 6 DEFENDANT LEFT BEHIND: “..Why is the ONLY man with a recording of the FBI/DHS ALSO the ONLY J6er left in jail? De Oppresso Liber - Jeremy Brown, USSF MSG (Ret.)

Lara Logan
@laralogan
STATEMENT FROM JAN 6 DEFENDANT LEFT BEHIND: “First, I'd like to congratulate those who are happy with the news they received today and to those who are not, I encourage them to say "THIS IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH!". Mr. Trump was handed a very detailed and legally sound plan, but he chose not to follow it. Second, I'd like to thank the outgoing Communist Puppet's Staff (world knows that Joe Biden can't do anything) for proving me correct and providing a list of names, in the form of nonexistent "pre-pardons" (Pardons are for crimes, not future charges.) that can now serve as proof of the Military/Intelligence Coup I've explained for 3+ years and those who were involved. Why "Pardon" the fraudulent J6 Select Committee, disgraced GEN Mark Milley, Ashli Babbitt's murder, Racist Michael Byrd and the supporting actors from the US Capital Police who perjured themselves on the stand and in the media, if they weren't involved in an orchestrated attack to setup lovers of our Constitutional Republic? As the ONLY clear pick for Deputy Director of the FBI, I know no better list of names to start my HUNT for the TRUE Criminals behind J6. (PLEASE send this to Mr. Kash Patel) Lastly, I was NOT issued a commutation NOR pardon and I'll remain in the DC Jail. Please, ask yourself and anyone you know... Why is the ONLY man with a recording of the FBI/DHS ALSO the ONLY J6er left in jail? De Oppresso Liber - Jeremy Brown, USSF MSG (Ret.) WhoIsJeremyBrown.com JeremyBrownDefense.com
58.8K
Views

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more