Skip to main content

GOMULKA: FRANCIS SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN ORDAINED.."Francis was accused not once, but twice in 2015 & 2024..If..Bergoglio were in the seminary when I taught, he would have been dismissed immediately if he failed to deny sexual allegations as he is doing today"

Sep 26, 2024 — Like his friend Bishop Gustavo Zanchetta who was sentenced for sexually abusing two seminarians, Francis was accused not once, but twice in 2015 ...

Views

Jun 17, 2024 — Gene Thomas Gomulka is a sexual abuse victims' advocate, investigative reporter, and screenwriter. A former Navy (O6) Captain/Chaplain, seminary ...
 

Complicit Clergy's Gene Gomulka who is a sexual abuse victims' advocate and investigative reporter is starting an investigation into sex abuse allegations against Francis after receiving "a report from a credible source that Pope Francis, when he was in Argentina, preyed upon and abused not one, but many Jesuit novices/seminarians." The following is his translation of an email he "sent to 367 priests of the Archdiocese of Buenos Aires":

Dear Father, 

Having been ordained a priest in 1974 and named a monsignor in 1999, I am now working in my retirement as an investigator and advocate for victims of sexual abuse. I have received a report from a credible source that Pope Francis, when he was in Argentina, preyed upon and abused not one, but many Jesuit novices/seminarians. 

In the United States, bishops, priests, and even seminarians knew for years, but kept their mouths shut, about how Cardinal Theodore McCarrick took advantage of young priests and seminarians. I know from firsthand experience that McCarrick's victims today feel betrayed by the Church's silence and its leaders' refusal to protect them. 

Just as many bishops and priests in the United States knew that McCarrick was allegedly abusing seminarians even if they themselves did not see him having sexual relations with them, I am inclined to believe that bishops and priests in Argentina may be aware of the accusations that Jorge Bergoglio abused vulnerable adults (Jesuit novices, seminarians, etc.) and engaged in homosexual behavior. 

I invite you to write to me if you have any knowledge of the sexual misconduct allegations involving Bergoglio. As a priest, I will treat your communications as if you were going to confession to me. I have never betrayed the confidence of any of my sources, as I know how good bishops, priests, and seminarians have been treated unfairly for breaking the Church's "Code of Silence" and denouncing what these Argentine abuse victims shared in a cafe in Buenos Aires:

 https://www.youtube.com/clip/Ugkx6o2KL4ln_xrYJjtng5uNz66F15KL606d 

You may want to go to mail.com and create a new anonymous email account and reply without revealing your identity. 

Thank you and God bless you in your ministry. Fraternally in Christ, Gene Thomas Gomulka msgr.investigations@gmail.com 

PS: Someone told me that three Jesuit novices in 1979 complained to the Congregation for the Clergy that they had been abused by Bergoglio and were then expelled from the Order. Do you know who these former Jesuits were? This may explain why Bergoglio has never returned to Argentina where I was told he received many death threats from abuse victims and their families. [https://www.gomulka.net/Buenos.pdf]

When I was teaching sacramental theology and liturgy to 20 diocesan seminarians and 10 Francisan brothers at St. Francis Seminary in Loretto, PA after earning a Licentiate in Sacred Theology in Rome, I voted at the end of the academic year to discontinue one of my students. The other faculty members disagreed with me and the rector decided to retain the seminarian on the condition that he repeat his first year of theology.  Although the seminarian was later ordained, he left the priesthood after being ordained less than a year. I would have preferred that I was wrong about him and that he would have proven to be a very dedicated, effective, and happy priest today.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...