Skip to main content

LifeSite: Why ‘universal and peaceful acceptance’ doesn’t prove Francis is pope.."Billot..& other theologians who express UPA..[say] if a true pope were to fall into heresy..would cease to be pope..a pope who once possessed UPA would cease to possess it"

Why ‘universal and peaceful acceptance’ doesn’t prove Francis is pope

Comments

Renato said…
St. Robert Berllarmine's argument speaks of the eventuality of a "heretical Pope", who would cease to be "ipso facto" the Supreme Pontificate, from which he himself deposes to cease to be also a Christian and a member of the Church. Therefore, in this case, the Church would not be judging a Pope, but an illegitimate Pope. The Church would only be removing from the Chair of St. Peter a man who does not have the office of Pope, of the Supreme Pontiff, which is precisely to defend the Catholic faith, and not to betray it.

And the argument for a “universal acceptance” among Catholics, because with this probable heretical man, who would occupy the Chair of St. Peter, as the article correctly shows, would obviously come to an end.

Therefore, in the case of Bergoglio, he clearly demonstrates that he is not Pope and has appointed 130 cardinals, 92 of whom have the right to vote in the next conclave.
But the "Universi Dominici Gregis" makes it clear that nothing can be changed in Rome after the death of the Roman Pontiff, in the example of the appointment of cardinals, which is inferred, in a situation also of total impediment to the office of the legitimate Pope, in articles 76 and 77; because Benedict XVI does not abdicate the office (“munus petrinum”) makes it clear that the conclave of 2013 was invalid.

It follows that the problem is not so much this usurper in the Chair of St. Peter who utters continual heresies, for he is only the consequence of a cause of an invalid election, but a probable non-continuity of a legitimate pontificate that he is going to provoke.

Because Catholics, especially legitimate cardinals, must understand that if there is no faith in Rome, then the cause was not the legitimate popes with doctrinal errors, but the cause is a clear occupation within Rome, which caused the apex with Bergoglio, in a planning that was finally completed.

Thus the Church would be in danger of no longer electing popes (something will not happen), with the necessary cardinals from the last legitimate pontificates, for valid conclaves.

Wouldn't this be their main intention with this (Bergoglio plans a successor who already calls him "John XIV"), to replace the Church with a world religion, according to these latest heresies uttered by him?
6:30 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

    Deliverance Prayers II  The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...
3 comments
Read more

"Well, 'either one gives up the scapular or they give up immodesty'. The point is they cannot coexist."

By Mary's Secretary In my book  The Practice of the Presence of Mary: To Live and Die with Mary , I dedicated Part II to Our Lady of Mount Carmel and Her scapular (fitting as Her feast is approaching), and I specifically mentioned how the scapular and spaghetti straps DO NOT go together. What I mean by that is I have noticed that those in the Church who DO NOT follow the Catholic dress code typically aren’t the ones wearing the scapular. I went on to say that modesty and the scapular go together and if you ever  were  immodest in dress, the scapular, being Our Lady’s sacramental that it is, gives one the grace to BECOME modest.  I can attest to this in my own life. Only after I was enrolled in the scapular did I begin, little by little, become modest. It’s a process. Kind of like the rosary quote, “one either gives up the sin or they give up the rosary.” Well, “either one gives up the scapular or they give up immodesty”. The point is they cannot coexist. In fact...
5 comments
Read more

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...
96 comments
Read more