Skip to main content

Who approved indicting Diddy? Opposing Trump didn't protect him from prosecution: @JackStr42679640..Diddy..bigger than most people can imagine..deep state..worry lies with Kamala..why DHS took control of the investigation—they know Diddy turned on them..chaos he could unleash threatens the 2024 elections'

P. Diddy is involved in something far bigger than most people can imagine—it leads all the way to the top. Trump and the military set the wheels in motion, and the Department of Homeland Security’s cover-up of the P. Diddy investigation will eventually connect to Kamala Harris, Epstein, and the Clintons. Trump is ensuring that the FBI and DHS will destroy themselves over this cover-up, which involves a military coup, extortion, human trafficking, and sex rings, all tied to major banks and international financial systems linked to Epstein. These military operations are much larger and more far-reaching than anyone realizes. Trump’s ultimate goal is to clean house at the FBI, CIA, and DHS, which are deeply involved in a military deep-state coup and sex trafficking operations tied to ex-presidents and vice presidents. P. Diddy’s arrest was meant to protect Kamala Harris. Hillary Clinton’s CIA operations are also involved. There’s currently a major power struggle within the Department of Justice, Homeland Security, and the FBI. I’ve already shared that P. Diddy was secretly arrested during Trump’s administration and became a triple agent, forced to turn against his former allies. He has vast amounts of compromising information—videos, servers, and intel involving top celebrities, elites, and U.S. officials. This information has been copied and is under the control of the White Hats within the FBI and DOJ. P. Diddy was forced to play a role in exposing the deep corruption within the DHS, FBI, and CIA, all connected to Clinton, Obama, and their regime. Now, there’s infighting between agencies, with the White Hats battling the Black Hats. The FBI investigation has been taken over by DHS under orders connected to Biden, Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, and Obama’s CIA operations. There is widespread panic in Hollywood, as many fear being exposed in these sex tapes—celebrities like the Kardashians, A-list actors, and producers. However, the deep state isn’t as concerned about them. The real worry lies with Kamala Harris, who appears in these videos along with Epstein, Bill Clinton, and even Chris Tucker. This is why DHS took control of the investigation—they know Diddy turned on them and that the chaos he could unleash threatens the 2024 elections. Hillary Clinton manipulated Kamala Harris into attending these secret parties in the early 2000s, where she was filmed at these infamous sex events that involved underage teens and even younger children. The internal fighting at the FBI, DHS, and DOJ is intensifying, with White Hats threatening to expose the rampant corruption. Behind the scenes, Trump, the military, White Hat FBI, DHS operatives, and intelligence agencies have been aware of these events. They knew the deep state, led by the Obama CIA and DS FBI, would try to shield P. Diddy from the public and silence him. Here’s what’s going to happen: The first investigation of P. Diddy will be a smokescreen, with the deep state dismantling his credibility in preparation for the second round of Trump’s White Hat indictments in 2025. This will connect to a coup aftermath and the chaos of 2024–2025. "Civil war-level chaos" is being planned, but after Trump and the military restore order in late spring 2025, the newly formed Department of Justice and FBI divisions will bring the real Diddy saga to light. These investigations will connect to Epstein, the banks tied to BlackRock, and the military coup. We are on a collision course with the truth about a deep-state, globalist coup against the United States. A near-civil-war scenario will show the American public the depths of this betrayal. QTSR/ed.Jack
Image

Who approved indicting Diddy?

Opposing Trump didn't protect him from prosecution

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...