Skip to main content

The Okie Traditionalist: Cardinal Burke’s Silence.."Cardinal Burke, if by chance you were to read this, God knows exactly why you are now being silent. There’s many factors we don’t know. But I hope you continue to fight the good fight for the Catholic Faith"

The Okie Traditionalist (Joseph Ostermeir)
Cardinal Burke’s Silence

Comments

Anonymous said…
To this day, Viganò also says nothing about whether or not he was reconsecrated by Willamson. There is a popular saying that says "he who is silent consents". Could it be that the cause is not losing one's salary and other benefits? Father Ramon Guidetti, a simple parish priest in Italy, was excommunicated and expelled from the parish for stating the obvious: there is no Petrine Munus in Bergoglio and so he is an antipope. He was later excommunicated and lost all his salary in the diocese to which he belonged. For he was only consistent in what Our Lord says: "What I say to you in the dark, say it in the open. Whatsoever is spoken in your ear, declare ye from the housetops" (Matthew 10:27).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FO3LXsRCey0
3:23 AM
Anonymous said…
JMJ

His Eminence Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke, in the face of the Bergoglian antipapacy lo these past eleven years has done little (Remember the Dubia years ago? That he didn't follow up on?) to nothing to stop the scandalizing, deception, and prolonged spiritual rape and murder of so many souls by the Argentinian apostate archcriminal in white squatting on the Chair of Peter.

Whatever his motives, externally his Eminence's behavior is that of a despicable coward. His excuses for inaction are lame copouts. GK Chesterton wrote something to the effect that something worth doing is worth doing even badly, so His Eminence's excuses for inaction fall flat.

Eminence, your time on earth is short, your looming punishment for your grave pastoral negligence is horrific beyond imagining...and will be unending. You wear the cardinalatial red, symbolizing martyr's blood. Act IMMEDIATELY!

5:28 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more