Skip to main content

Nick Donnelly @ProtecttheFaith..You know the one's who have a 'magic' understanding of the papacy who assume obedience to a heretic [Francis] will get them into heaven.

Post

Conversation

Nick Donnelly
@ProtecttheFaith
I've lost patience with people swanning onto twitter to tell me I exaggerating the 'problem' with Jorge Bergoglio Or the others who tell me I'm in schism or an apostate. You know the one's who have a 'magic' understanding of the papacy who assume obedience to a heretic will get them into heaven.
11.4K
Views

Comments

Anonymous said…
Everyone must question what obedience this is around us regarding Bergoglio: whether it is through a cohesive rational adherence to faith or simply a non-cohesive irrational adherence to faith. Because many Catholics live a faith influenced only by others, for example in emotional dedication to a favorite Catholic who has an Internet channel. Or simply by the priest who never said anything about sin in his own parish. Today there is a lot of confusion about Bergoglio because we do not seek the truth that is one in God. And the Church does not fail to show evidence to the faithful, in the way that was shown in previous comments on Universe Dominici Gregis in articles 76 and 77 about what actually happened in the abdication of Benedict XVI. This is the current confusing sea: divergent or completely uninterested options regarding this pontificate. But if we are questioned for seeking the truth, then we are on the right path. Just let us not forget that without God we can do nothing (John 15:5).
10:47 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more