Skip to main content

Flashback of Taylor Marshall with George Neumayr: Why did Taylor Marshall Chicken Out in Questioning Bp. Schneider on the Bellarmine teaching on Heretical Popes Ceasing to be Pope?

We Go There
@CoffinMedia
George Neumayr died a year ago today. How did he die? He was one of my most courageous interviewees.
In Memory of George Neumayr
From complicitclergy.com
2,045

Views

Why are USA Bishops Tone-Deaf & Promoting Liberal ...

YouTube · Dr Taylor Marshall
56.3K+ views · 4 years ago

Taylor Marshall sits down with George Neumayr to give you a full review on the 2019 USCCB meeting in Baltimore: the votes, the talks, ...

On November 15, 2019, Taylor Marshall said "Bellarmine says when anyone is a manifest heretic even the pope he ceases to be a member of the Church and they can no longer hold their office "


Why did Marshall chicken out in questioning Bishop Athanasius Schneider on Doctor of the Church St. Robert Bellarmine's teaching on heretic popes ceasing to be pope in his podcast with Bishop Athanasius Schneider on the 28th of February?

On November 15, Marshall and the contributing editor of The American Spectator George Neumayr who is a best-selling author and former editor of the Catholic World Report apparently called on the Catholic cardinals to convene in order to judge if Francis is a "manifest heretic" which could mean he "self vacated the Chair of St. Peter" and is no longer the pope.

In Marshall's popular YouTube channel the two declare what "should happen":

"[Neumayr said Doctor of the Church St.] Robert Bellarmine said members of the Church have the right and duty to resist a bad pope... It is the cardinals who have the power to confront the pope and say do you actually support the teachings of the Church. If you don't then you self vacated the Chair of St. Peter and we can move to elect a new pope... "

"... [Marshall said] Bellermine says when anyone is a manifest heretic even the pope he ceases to be a member of the Church and they can no longer hold their office... It seems to me that that would require a ecclesiastical decree... You would have to have cardinals make this decree... "

"... [Neumayr said] It's a case of declaration. They are simply declaring what Francis himself has done through his actions and statements. He would in fact have self vacated the Chair of St. Peter then the cardinals would simply come in and declare that happened and move to fill the Chair with a new pope. We are at that stage when I know that should happen."
(Dr. Taylor Marshall YouTube Channel, "Why are USA Bishops Tone-Deaf & Promoting Liberal Policies? w George Neumayr," 1:02:05 to 1:06:55)

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church and for the laity to demand that the cardinals convene an imperfect council to judge if Francis is a manifest heretic.

Comments

MEwbank said…
It seems as if Marshall might actually reading your blog since, until now, he has seemed to take a posture of 'papalotry' that would preclude saying anything that would echo Cardinal Bellarmine.
8:45 AM 
Fr. VF said…
"... [Marshall said] Bell[a]rmine says when ANYONE is a manifest heretic even the pope THEY cease to be a member of the Church and THEY can no longer hold their office..."

The fact that even bona fide Catholic trads are using the "singular 'they'" shows just how insidious this Marxist gender-weapon is.
10:08 AM 
PGMGN said…
Excellent observation.
10:18 AM 
Michael Dowd said…
We must spread the word on our false Pope. I just posted this article on FB.
1:41 PM 
Roseanne said…
Read where Innocent 3rd was a layman when he was elected Pope. Perhaps that might be the road to travel in the current state of Vatican affairs.
3:26 PM 
Alexis Bugnolo said…
marshall and Schneider are shameless flip floppers for their careers. No faith, only desire for praise and money...

Comments

DJG said…
A formal heretic is someone who holds to a heretical belief that he knows to be contrary to perennial or doctrinal Catholic teaching.
When any Catholic becomes a formal heretic, that person ceases to be a Catholic.
No Catholic is excluded from the fact that he ceases to be a Catholic when he becomes a formal heretic.
A Pope is a Catholic, and therefore no exception applies to him as regards a Catholic who becomes a formal heretic ceasing to be a Catholic.

By teaching that the death penalty can never be permissible, Bergoglio has shown that he is a material heretic. By replacing the teaching in the Catechism of the Catholic Church that the death penalty can sometimes be permissible, with his own teaching that the death penalty can never be permissible, Bergoglio has shown that he is also a formal heretic, because he clearly knows what the teaching of the Catholic Church on the death penalty really is.

And of course there are other things that he has taught that arguably also show him to be a formal heretic.

Yet despite all this, and despite so many people calling attention to this grave matter, not only do our cardinals and bishops neglect to do anything about it, they even fail to reasonably discuss the matter, as though there were nothing to talk about, nothing to see here, no charlatan behind the curtain to look at. Our cardinals and bishops fail to attend to this grave matter, and they also fail to answer the many concerns of their flock in this grave matter of whether or not Bergoglio is actually a valid Pope.

2:35 PM
Anonymous said…
JPII changed canon law to allow giving holy communion to those of other faiths. I was recently watching a debate on why that didn't make him a heretic and the argument was advanced that who was allowed to receive communion was a matter of discipline not a revealed truth. Not sure how you all go along with giving holy communion (the Body and Blood of Christ) to anyone who requests it (for instance at a papal "mass" for 2 million in philadelphia or the phillipines) including Bill Clinton and Nelson Mandela etc. etc. etc. but want Francis removed for 'changing the teaching' on the death penalty.

https://novusordowatch.org/2024/01/sspv-novus-ordo-debate-sedevacantism/
8:08 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more