Skip to main content

@LauraLoomer X is now hiring staff to interfere in our elections. First the people who were pro Trump got demonetized and we are told X is hiring to combat “election disinformation”. The people who want to decide who should be monetized now want to tell you how to vote.

X is now hiring staff to interfere in our elections. First the people who were pro Trump got demonetized and we are told X is hiring to combat “election disinformation”. The people who want to decide who should be monetized now want to tell you how to vote. thenationalpulse.com/2023/08/19/x-i

Comments

Anonymous said…
It is obvious that this antagonism will grow stronger next year, but not only in America. As Ukraine today is practically something saturated, as it is a totally destroyed country and without a real hope. Then there is talk of a new stage of new "pandemics" in order to create more world chaos. In addition, there are grain and fertilizer supply problems in the Black Sea between Ukraine and Russia, as the economic crisis will grip both East and West. Further south, knowing all this, Africa has the problem caused in Niger whose Western-allied president was beaten and replaced by the military, but in the nationalist and pro-Russian ideology. There are reports of foreign troops heading there. In South America, Zionists are increasingly present in Paraguay and Uruguay, although there is South American interest in the BRICS.
Anonymous said…
This problem in the Black Sea is quite serious. We can notice that it is in accordance with the wishes of the old men of Davos. Thus, they will force us to eat insects....
Anonymous said…
In Brazil, diesel fuel is starting to get expensive and has been lacking even in one state of the Brazilian federation. Now there are blackouts on the power grid. And there is a strong suspicion of sabotage. We must keep in mind that this country is a major supplier of food; With a very expensive freight, however, everything will break.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...