Skip to main content

@Bug_Hall We should form a Trad Coalition every WYD. Send a few heavy hitters with a large group of agitators to evangelize the "new evangelization".


🇻🇦Bug Hall🌱
@Bug_Hall
We should form a Trad Coalition every WYD. Send a few heavy hitters with a large group of agitators to evangelize the "new evangelization".
3,238
Views

Comments

Anonymous said…
Do normal Catholic think a pope can dispense with the moral law? Most of these intensely Catholic youth (who else would attend WYD?) didn’t bat an eye that there was a mass promoting LGBT.
10:37 AM
Anonymous said…
Benedict XVI resigned from the ministry only. Renouncing the ministry is only valid when the headquarters is impeded. Bergorglio and the conclave thus became null and void in 2013. So all the acts of a usurper are null and void like that. This German pope was a Katechon, for Bergoglio leads the Church from apostasy and globalism. According to Universi Dominici Gregis, the cardinals must intervene in order to remove him from the Chair of St. Peter. It only takes a few legitimate cardinals to say that the see is prevented and vacant and to promote a conclave for a legitimate successor of Benedict XVI. Of course, it's something, nothing is easy. The laity must do their part. But many do not come clearly to the above evidence. Many say that Benedict XVI was a modernist or Francis or Benedict, it doesn't matterit which pope, as Cionci reports. And so they seek uncanonical and deceptive solutions of building archipelagos here and there, not simply going to WYD and doing similar things. But this is against virtue. Because they are palliative and that resolves maybe only at a brief moment. The problem, of course, will continue, and time itself will reveal that all this was useless. So going against the evidence is a sign of pride.

Renato
11:34 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more