Skip to main content

Bishop Strickland decries Latin Mass restrictions as ‘attack’ on the ‘Deposit of Faith’

Bishop Strickland decries Latin Mass restrictions as ‘attack’ on the ‘Deposit of Faith’

Comments

Anonymous said…
If Christ confirms the other apostles that his Vicar is Peter, then he would never lose the deposit of faith as Christ Himself later confirmed too. Because Peter represents that the true Church would never be destroyed by the forces of hell. This is part of the Catholic creed. Bergoglio does not fit in as Vicar of Christ, much less has the authority to change the deposit of faith. If we believe that Bergoglio is pope, then the forces of hell today have prevailed – in the example of the new golden calf at WYD which is the Gnostic agenda of welcoming everything and everyone, to the detriment of faith. So we can coldly come to the conclusion that many demonstrate a crisis of faith or have come to the total loss of it. If they don't see the obvious one, then much less have they seen the solution.

Renato
Anonymous said…
The impediment imposed on Benedict XVI's enemies to go out on the Chair of Peter was a call from Christ to accept the cross; in Peter's room, however, as he himself afterwards stated. This should be analyzed out of love for the pope and the Church. In Vatican II there was an resistant Catholic reflex, but not authentic. We discern true Catholics by examplefrom a St. Bernard or St. Catherine of Siena, because they were true sons of the pope: with examples, corrections and discernment in order to a solution offered by the Church. Because they knew that she never forsakes those children who seek her for love, for the history of the Church is always consistent with this. And And those inauthentic in the past continue the inauthentic legacy today. Because there are murmurings, lamentations, and even despair. Will there still be faith when the great tribulation comes?

Renato
Anonymous said…
In the first comment above it is written that it is part of the creed, though implicitly it is even true; But it's part of the faith, it's not a specific Catholic creed. In the second, the correct would be inauthentic by the past. That is, they would continue in the old mistake. I am sorry!

Renato

Popular posts from this blog

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

    Deliverance Prayers II  The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...

Has the Trad Media fallen into a COVID-like mass formation with "the Uncola or 'UnFrancis'" Leo XVI? While it's humorous to see the former anti-Francis Trad pundits suddenly acting like teen age girls infatuated with Leo, it could lead to a Trojan Horse effect

May 2023-Cardinal Robert Prevost Honorary Doctorate from the Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo (USAT). Posted by Elizabeth Yore... ... Frankly, it’s shocking and inconceivable that a newly elected pontiff would cite as his guiding light the theology of Joseph Bernardin, a known sexual predator and radical collaborator of Marxist and community activist, Saul Alinsky... ... Bernardin and the Alinsky... gave birth to the moral relativism of Bernardin’s seamless garment religion, which is referenced in Prevost’s speech. Prevost espouses the “seamless garment” radical ideology of Cardinal Joseph Bernardin , former Archbishop of Chicago. It is long overdue that American Catholics wake up about the real Joseph Bernardin . [ https://www.yorechildren.com/blog/2025/5/20/the-chicago-way] It is difficult to capture all the arresting insights of Desmet’s rewarding book, which includes the startling claim that [COVID] tyrannical leaders are, very often,  themselves  captive t...