Flashback: Might Child Grooming Supporters like the Disney & Ukraine Regimes be Mirrored in the Francis "Vatican's 'Nightmare' [Grooming-like] Sex-Ed Program"?
Anyone who opposes anti-grooming laws like the one in Florida is pro-child predator.
Stop sexualizing children. [https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1509189815773847556]
Disney's Latest Debacle Over Florida's Anti-Grooming Bill Is Just The Latest Piece Of Evidence ...linkingin.co
Nolte: Disney's Support for Child Grooming Is a Game Changer
Mercatornet asked might little kids being sexualized "pro-child predator' advocates really be about "grooming?" in their post "No sex ed for under-8s in Florida schools — and the wokerati are outraged? How would you distinguish it from grooming?":
Florida kindergarteners to grade threes won’t be taught sex ed at school, after both of the state’s houses approved a “Parental Rights in Education” bill in recent weeks. Awaiting a signature from Governor Ron DeSantis, the new law will come into effect on July 1.
And get this: the wokerati are outraged...
... Yet the controversial clause of the new law is as brief as it is unremarkable:
“‘Classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade three or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards.”
Russia appears to claim that the Ukraine war may involve similar culture war criteria according to the liberal Boston Review:
In this way, “traditional values” and sexual politics become linked to geopolitics and, in effect, to the status of Ukraine and other post-Soviet states. In 2013 the Russian newspaper Izvestiya warned that West-sponsored LGBT activism could spark a “gay revolution” risking to throw Russia back to the societal chaos of the 1990s. This must be seen against Putin’s repeated warnings about a possible “color revolution” in Russia, similar to those that had taken place in Ukraine in 2004–5 and in Georgia in 2003. As the Maidan protests against the pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych began in Ukraine in late 2013, Russia’s largest newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda claimed that the protests were co-organized by “nationalists, anti-Semites, neo-Nazis and homosexuals.” Understanding this explicit link that is made between sexuality, gender, and geopolitical confrontation is necessary for making sense of the statements made by Patriarch Kirill, the leader of the Russian Orthodox Church, who spoke out in support of the war earlier this month:
War, aggression, and colonization are supported by what political scientist Michael J. Shapiro calls “violent cartographies,” imaginary moral maps depicting the homeland as innocent and good and the territories of Others as dangerous and therefore legitimate objects of violence. All ambiguity and complexity not fitting this Manichean model must be ignored, denied, or constructed as foreign. In the geopolitical worldview of the Kremlin, Russia is standing up for “traditional values” in the face of a morally corrupt West weakened by sexual liberalism. In numerous speeches, Putin has positioned Russia as an international leader in the defense of “traditional values.” In this way, gender conservatism contributes to carving out a meaningful geopolitical role for Russia in a world order where LGBT rights have become international politics and increasingly framed as a question of civilization and modernity—an indicator of who, in the words of Hillary Clinton in her speech to the UN Office in Geneva on Human Rights Day in 2011. [https://bostonreview.net/articles/putins-anti-gay-war-on-ukraine/]
For eight years there have been attempts to destroy what exists in Donbas. Donbas has fundamentally refused to accept the so-called values that are being offered by those aspiring for worldwide power. There is a specific test of loyalty to these powers, a requirement for being permitted into the happy world of excessive consuming and apparent freedom. This test is very straightforward and at the same time horrifying—the gay parade. The demand to organize a gay-parade is a test of loyalty to this powerful world. And we know that if a people or a country refuses this test, they are not considered part of that world, they are considered as aliens to it. . . . Therefore, what is happening today in international relations does not only have political meaning. It is about something different and much more important than politics. It is about human salvation, about on which side of God the Savior humankind will end up.
Finally, it appears that Francis is backhandedly pushing a similar agenda as the Disney and Ukraine regimes:
In 2017, The Catholic Monitor reported that Francis apparently is allowing, one of his closest
collaborators, Cardinal Reinhard Marx and his German bishops to continue in the
Marx and the German bishop's huge porn publishing company sold pornography for over a decade. The bishops were rebuked by Pope Benedict XVI after he was informed. After the papal rebuke, the German bishops promised the porn business would be sold according to Lifesitenews.com articles on October 31 and November 23, 2011.
The blog Vox Cantoris on September 18, 2015 wrote that Cardinal Marx and the German bishops were still in the same porn business and Francis did not "call them out." The blog asked:
"Why is Pope Francis blind to Germany's rich and porn producing bishops?"
In 2016, Francis's next x-rated outrage was appointing Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia to head the Pontifical Council for the Family. The papal appointee commissioned a gay neo-pornographic mural at his former cathedral which was called "blasphemous," "disgusting," and "demonic" according to Lifesitenews.com on March 15, 2017.
Lastly, the most disgraceful porn and gay scandal:
Francis appointed mural pornography commissioner Paglia to produce a sex education program which was released with the "apparent approval" of Francis on World Youth Day according to a March 6, 2017 article.
The article was written by psychologists Gerard van den Aardweg and Rick Fitzgerald on Lifesitenews.com.
Paglia's sex ed program used porn "like" that used by "sexual predators."
The psychologists stated that the Vatican approved and released the program called Meeting Point that "contained homoerotic and heterosexual pornography which was like that employed by adult predators of youth."
The two experts said the porn predator-like program "should be withdrawn as soon as possible by the Vatican and its website closed." [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/11/flashback-francis-child-porn-vatican.html]