"I believe in COVID almighty. The creator of lockdown on earth which
was conceived of the unholy fear of it and borne of the fear of it. It
suffered under a bunch of lies about it. It stupefied and was gloried.
It descended into the earth. It ascended into the presidential thrones
where they shall judge the banning of Masses and the COVID dead.
"I believe in Amoris Laetitia, the communion of adulterers, Francis's representation of the globalist teachings which is embodied in the climate change gospel, a one-world government and the goddess mother earth everlasting."
I wrote this ecumenical creed with the hope it will help the Francis traditionalists and the Francis liberals to unite in their common belief in the COVID almighty.
While it is well known that virus traditionalists like Steve Skojec, One Peter Five contributor Roberto de Mattei and all the virus trads feel uncomfortable with the part of the creed about the climate change gospel and the communion of adulterers, they must endure this temporary discomfort.
They must remember that they marched in step with the Francis liberals in the part of the creed about the COVID almighty, the banning of Masses and that anyone who dies even if they didn't have the virus can be added to the sacred virus death toll so that it can keep the unholy fear of it going everlasting.
Moreover, this year, One Peter Five contributor Roberto de Mattei joined Skojec and the Francis Vatican in giving his apparent full support for the COVID vaccine. [Roberto de Mattei: 10 Questions to All Those Holding the “Anti-Vax” Position - OnePeterFive: https://onepeterfive.com/roberto-de-mattei-10-questions-to-all-those-holding-the-anti-vax-position/]
Why has One Peter Five contributor de Mattei marched in step with Skojec and the Francis Vatican's totalitarian lockdown tyranny since last year?
Why has he since last year attacked Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò's appeal for basic human rights and religious freedom?
Last year, Gloria.tv reported that the non-medical expert "De Mattei Attack[ed] His Friend Viganò":
The Roman historian Roberto de Mattei critizised Archbishop Viganò's appeal against the Coronavirus regime.
De Mattei told Die-Tagespost.de (13 May) that it perplexes him when bishops comment on "health measures" taken by governments because this "exceeds their field of expertise." However, such a self-evident statement is hardly enough to disqualify the Viganò appeal. [https://gloria.tv/post/BBiTKmK4ULqE4V1tyPytN8yTK]
Last year, One Peter Five's publisher Steve Skojec was like pro-abortion eugenicist Michael Savage screaming that the COVID was the Black Plague so we needed totalitarian lockdowns and the banning of the Mass.
De Mattei apparently joined Skojec in "lent[ing] credence to this farce" of COVID hysteria that brought the totalitarian lockdowns and the banning of the Mass.
Lawyer and journalist Chris Ferrera put it best:
"Meanwhile, the Catholic commentators who have lent credence to this farce - we all know who they are - should have enough honesty to hang their heads in shame for the way they led the faithful, by fear, into the jaws of tyranny."
(The Remnant, "Coronagate Update: The Con Collapses as the People Rise Up, An Inside Perspective," April 21, 2020)
On the vaccine issue, why did non-expert in medicine or science de Mattei apparently join the Francis Vatican in giving his apparent full support for the COVID vaccine?
Skojec's One Peter Five claims "no one has refuted" de Mattei's "moral" support for the COVID vaccine. [[https://onepeterfive.com/pro-life-catholic-philosopher-josef-seifert-speaks-out-on-coronavirus-vaccine/]
In May, Skojec's non-expert in medicine or science was answered by renowned statistician Dr. William Briggs who is a consultant and adjunct Professor of Statistics at Cornell University with specialties in medicine and philosophy of science:
BURDEN OF PROOF
I remind readers that we skeptics have no burden whatsoever to prove that mask mandates and lockdowns don’t work, or even that experimental vaccines don’t cause harm. We have prima facie evidence that, indeed, masks and lockdowns are useless and that these rushed-to-production vaccines do cause more harm than usual.
Where is the definitive proof, and refutations of the evidence we possess, for masks and lockdowns? It does not exist.
There is a paper going around from Experts at MIT saying, in the same way journalist say it, that only certified opinion should count in the mask debate. Hello, Appeal to Authority! (It’s way funnier than that. It amounts to them saying, “Random dudes on the internet know more than we do: how do we stop them?”
There is also Nicholas Wade’s work providing solid, but not definitive, evidence the coronadoom was indeed lab engineered, for use in so-called gain-of-function experiments.
This update is already too long to get both of those things, which we’ll do another day.
Nothing says “effective, safe vaccine” more than celebrities, elites, Experts, rulers, officials, quacks, and nitwit reporters screaming at you, telling you how stupid you are, swearing at you, giving you the finger, or even offering you free beer and credit at school, with the rest cajoling, wheedling, castigating, and, finally, forbidding you freedom if you refuse to comply.
As some foaming-at-the-mouth media hack shrieks “TAKE YOUR MEDICINE!”, you think to yourself, “Boy, that must be one miracle drug.”
Is it any wonder people become anti-vaxxers? That the least of us (arrogant Experts etc.) treat people like something that needs scraping off their shoes makes it rational to distrust what they’re selling.
It’s worse than that. Obviously, if the costs outweigh the benefits of the vaccines, then these Experts have blood on their hands when they manage to coerce somebody into taking a vaccine they shouldn’t have taken. But also, suppose the benefits of these experimental vaccines really do outweigh their costs. Then because the boorish and ludicrous behavior of Experts cause people to forgo the vaccine, then the Experts are responsible for killing people. Either way, Experts acting like jackasses causes harm.
All vaccines cause harm. They are designed to. They force your body to react as if it was being attacked, which it is, by the vaccine, so that your body might better fend off stronger attacks. Again I say, causing harm is what vaccines are designed to do on the age-old theory no pain, no gain.
Many, and perhaps even all (numbers, as we’ll see, are hard to come by), vaccines cause so much harm that some die from the vaccine. Not just the coronadoom vaccines, but all of them.
So there’s a risk of either death or great, measurable harm to all vaccines. There’s also a risk of death or great, measurable harm from the diseases the vaccine are for. People, not Experts, have to choose between these risks. [https://wmbriggs.com/post/35617/]
Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He want you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost - Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.
of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt
the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church
in such a situation:
"[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See."
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)
Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said "the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church."
- "If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html
- "Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html
- LifeSiteNews, "Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial
weight behind communion for adulterers," December 4, 2017:
The AAS guidelines explicitly allows "sexually active adulterous couples facing 'complex circumstances' to 'access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'"
- On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:
"The AAS statement... establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense."
- On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:
"Francis' heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents."
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.
- Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: "212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted...Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden" [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]
- Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times "Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003": http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html