NeverTrumper RINO War Hawk Neocons: "Where [Leninist] Trotsky Meets Stalin and Hitler" is "a Kind of [Nationalist Socialist] State Capitalism" like in China
Dr. Srdja Trifkovic, who was the Foreign Affairs Editor of Chronicles, and the author of The Sword of the Prophet and Defeating Jihad explained the the NeverTrumper RINO war hawk neoconservatives came from "the Socialist Party at a time when it was Trotskyite in outlook and politics" and today "share with Stalin and Hitler an ideology of nationalist socialism and internationalist imperialism" such as in Communist China:
The neoconservatives are often depicted as former Trotskyites who have
morphed into a new, closely related life form. It is pointed out that
many early neocons—including The Public Interest founder Irving
Kristol and coeditor Nathan Glazer, Sidney Hook, and Albert
Wohlstetter—belonged to the anti-Stalinist far left in the late 1930s
and early 1940s, and that their successors, including Joshua Muravchik
and Carl Gershman, came to neoconservatism through the Socialist Party
at a time when it was Trotskyite in outlook and politics. As early as
1963 Richard Hofstadter commented on the progression of many
ex-Communists from the paranoid left to the paranoid right, clinging all
the while to the fundamentally Manichean psychology that underlies
both. [Half a century] later the dominant strain of neoconservatism is
declared to be a mixture of geopolitical militarism and “inverted
socialist internationalism.”
Blanket depictions of neoconservatives as redesigned Trotskyites need
to be corrected in favor of a more nuanced analysis. In several
important respects the neoconservative world outlook has diverged from
the Trotskyite one and acquired some striking similarities with
Stalinism and German National Socialism. Today’s neoconservatives share
with Stalin and Hitler an ideology of nationalist socialism and
internationalist imperialism. The similarities deserve closer scrutiny
and may contribute to a better understanding of the most influential
group in the U.S. foreign policy-making community.
Certain important differences remain, notably the neoconservatives’
hostility not only to Nazi race-theory but even to the most benign
understanding of national or ethnic coherence. On the surface, there are
also glaring differences in economics. However, the neoconservative
glorification of the free market is mere rhetoric, designed to placate
the businessmen who fund them, than reality. In fact, the
neoconservatives favor not free enterprise but a kind of state
capitalism—within the context of the global apparatus of the World Bank
and the IMF—that Hitler would have appreciated.
Some form of gradual but irreversible and desirable withering away of
the state is a key tenet of the Trotskyite theoretical outlook. The
neoconservatives, by contrast, are statists par excellence.
Their core belief—that society can be managed by the state in both its
political and economic life—is equally at odds with the traditional
conservative outlook and with the non-Stalinist Left. In this important
respect the neoconservatives are much closer to Stalinism and National
Socialism.
They do not want to abolish the state; they want to control
it—especially if the state they control is capable of controlling all
others. They are not “patriotic” in any conventional sense of the term
and do not identify themselves with the real and historic America but
see the United States merely as the host organism for the exercise of
their Will to Power. Whereas the American political tradition has been
fixated on the dangers of centralized state power, on the desirability
of limited government and non-intervention in foreign affairs, the
neoconservatives exalt and worship state power, and want America to
become a hyper-state in order to be an effective global hegemon. Even
when they support local government it is on the grounds that it is more
efficient and responsive to the demands of the Empire, not on
constitutional grounds.
The neoconservative view of America as a hybrid, “imagined” nation had an ardent supporter eight decades ago: in Mein Kampf
Adolf Hitler argued for a new, tightly centralized Germany by invoking
the example of the United States and the triumph of the Union over
states’ rights. He concluded that “National Socialism, as a matter of
principle, must lay claim to the right to force its principles on the
whole German nation without consideration of previous federated state
boundaries.”
Hitler was going to make a new Germany the way he imagined it, or else destroy it. In the same vein the Weekly Standard writers are “patriots” only insofar as the America they imagine is a pliable tool of their global design...
... The neoconservative mindset is apocalyptic (which is a Nazi and Stalinist trait), rather than utopian (which characterizes the Trotskyite Left). The replacement of the Soviet threat with the more amorphous “terrorism” reflects the doomsday revolutionary mentality that can never rest. New missions and new wars will have to be engineered." [https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/article/neoconservatism-where-trotsky-meets-stalin-and-hitler/]
According to the Storm Front website the RINO Neocons are "the reincarnation to some extent of both Leninism and Bolshevism":
Former neoconservative luminary Francis Fukuyama of Stanford (formerly
of Johns Hopkins) compares the neoconservative movement to Leninism.
Neoconservatism, according to Fukuyama, is the reincarnation to some
extent of both Leninism and Bolshevism.
Fukuyama’s observation makes sense when even Irving Kristol, who founded
the movement, proudly admitted that the “honor I most prized was the
fact that I was a member in good standing of the [Trotskyist] Young
People’s Socialist League (Fourth International).”
And this neoconservative movement, as Jewish writer Sidney Blumenthal
has shown, found its political and intellectual ideology “in the
disputatious heritage of the Talmud.”
Even after the birth of the neoconservative movement, many of its
members such as Stephen Schwartz of the Weekly Standard and Joan
Wohlstetter of the RAND Corporation still had a burning thirst for Lev
Davidovich Bronstein, known as Leon Trotsky. [https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t942312/]
Francis Notes:
- Doctor
of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt
the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church
in such a situation:
"[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See."
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)
Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said "the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church."
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]
- "If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html
- "Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html
- LifeSiteNews, "Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial
weight behind communion for adulterers," December 4, 2017:
The AAS guidelines explicitly allows "sexually active adulterous couples
facing 'complex circumstances' to 'access the sacraments of
Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'"
- On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:
"The AAS statement... establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia
has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense."
- On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:
"Francis' heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the
Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters
magisterial documents."
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.
Election Notes:
- Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: "212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted...Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden" [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]
- Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times "Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003": http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1]