Francis's book "Dialogos entre Juan Pablo II Y Fidel Castro" presents
evidence that he is pro-Communist "Revolution," anti-Capitalism and by inference
Anti-American because the United States is the driving force behind the
global free market system.
He wrote on page 23 that there apparently could be a "convergence" of "premises" between Communism and Catholicism:
"Fidel Castro offered a... convergence or points of connection between
Catholicism and the premises (los postulados) of the [Cuban Communist]
Revolution."
However, later in the his book he states there cannot be a convergence of premises between Capitalism and Catholicism:
You cannot hold the premises (los postulados) of "neoliberalismo"
(Capitalism) and be considered a Christian. The failures of Marxism and
Collectivism don't authorize the Capitalist system (al sistema
capitalista)... we find in "neoliberalismo" (Capitalism) the opposite of
the Gospel... because it empties man of the economic progressivism or
economic progress (los progresos economicos)."
(Dialogos entre Juan Pablo II Y Fidel Castro, By Jorge Bergoglio,
Copyright - Ciudad Argentina, Pages 48-49, Translation by Fred Martinez
with the help of a Spanish to English dictionary)
In 2015, the Muslim global news source Al Jazeera in a article asked:
"Is Pope Francis some kind of Communist? Is he anti-American? Why is he
so down on the wealth-creating engine that is global capitalism?"
The global news source answered those questions by saying "he [Francis]
adhered to a diluted Argentine version of [Marxist] liberation
theology."
Al Jazeera actually quoted from Francis's book without giving a source
which is given above with my translation. It's translation is:
"No one can accept the precepts of neoliberalism and consider themselves Christian."
It appears that for Francis "neoliberalism" is a synonym for global Capitalism.
The global news source reported that Francis was anti-Capitalist and
apparently anti-American since the driving force of global Capitalism is
the United States.
Al Jazeera disclosed that in a disquieting screech, he reviled
capitalism for "death and destruction" and having the "stench of the
dung of the devil":
"During a trip to [Leftist Socialist] Bolivia this summer, Francis
delivered his most ferocious denunciation to date. Behind all the 'pain,
death and destruction' wrought by unrestrained global capitalism, there
lurks 'the stench of the dung of the devil,' he told a gathering of
activists. 'We want change, real change, structural change. This system
is now intolerable.'"
(Aljazeera, "Liberation theology, once reviled by church, now embraced by pope," September 22, 2015)
Are the unsound mental workings of Francis's apparently unbalanced mind telling him that it was not the Russian Communists and the Chinese Maoist Communists (who
are still in power) that committed the holocaust of tens of millions of
human "death[s] and destruction" in historical concrete reality, but
instead the Communist "holocaust" was committed by global Capitalism in
the imagination of the seemingly crazy brain of Francis?
Does this craziness for "real change" to end "intolerable" American global
Capitalism bring about Francis allowing without protest:
- the Communist Chinese regime to systematically attack the human rights
of the Chinese Catholic underground Church, all the Christian
denominations in China and even the Chinese Muslims?
- the human rights violations and starvation of the citizens of
Venezuela by the Chinese Communist supported Venezuelan Leftist
totalitarian regime?
And here is more evidence that Francis may be crazy for Communism:
Jose Azel, a senior scholar at the University of Miami, in the respected
international relations quarterly journal World Affairs wrote a review
of a book by Pope Francis, which he wrote in 1998 while he was still the
then Archbishop of Buenos Aires, which apparently Francis and
Vatican don't want publicized or read.
There are usually only available a few copies of Jorge Mario Bergoglio's [Francis's] book "Dialogos Entre
Juan Pablo y Fidel Castro [Dialogue between John Paul II and Fidel
Castro]" and when they are available on Amazon it can be selling for a pretty penny.
The Spanish speaking Azel in his review of the book reported "[i]n my reading of the pope's complex Spanish prose...":
- "he favors socialism over capitalism provided it incorporates theism..."
- "He does not take issue with Fidel Castro's claim that 'Karl Marx's doctrine is very close to the Sermon on the Mount'... "
- "... and views the Cuban polity [form of government] as in harmony with the Church's social doctrine..."
- "... Francis leaves no doubt that he sympathizes with the Cuban dictatorship..."
- "... and that he is not a fan of liberal democracy or markets..."
- "... He clearly believes in a very large, authoritarian role for the state in social and economic affairs..."
- "... his language in the prologue is reminiscent of the 'liberation
theology'... very intertwined [with] Marxist ideology. Fathered by
Peruvian priest Gustavo Gutierrez, the movement provided the
intellectual foundations that, with Cuban support, served to
orchestrate' wars of national liberation' throughout the continent. It's
iconography portrayed Jesus as a guerrilla an AK-47 slung over his
shoulder..."
- "... Francis speaks of a 'shared solidarity'... that solidarity
appears to be with the undemocratic, illegitimate authority in Cuba and
not with the people..."
- "... Cubans will remember that this pope had a choice between freedom and authoritarianism."
(World Affairs, "Whose Pope? Francis and Cuba," Fall 2015 and https://thecubaneconomy.com/articles/authors/azel-jose/)
The University of Miami senior scholar Azel in the article in his own translation of Francis's book quotes the pope saying:
"[N]eoliberal capitalism is a model that subordinates human beings and
conditions development to pure market forces... thus humanity attends a
cruel spectacle that crystallizes the enrichment of the few at the
expense of the impoverishment of the many."
Is this the reason why among legitimate world leaders, that is leaders
who are not Islamists (Iran's leadership), ex-Communists (the Russian
leadership) and Communists (the Cuban and Chinese totalitarian
leadership), only the Socialist Democratic presidential candidate Bernie
Sanders and Francis refuse to condemn the Venezuelan Nicolas Maduro's
Socialist dictatorship and back Venezuelan assembly leader, Juan Guaido,
as the country's interim president?
(Politico, "'He is not going to be the nominee's: Dems slam Sanders over Maduro stance," February 21, 2019)
According to Politico even the left leaning Florida Democrats were
slamming Bernie Sanders over his pro-totalitarian Venezuelan stance.
Why aren't Catholics, and all those who care about the plight of the
oppressed Venezuelan people suffering under the Socialist
"authoritarian... state," slamming Francis like even the left leaning
Florida Democrats are slamming Sanders for not condemning dictator Maduro and not
backing Guaido?
Francis Notes:
- Doctor
of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt
the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church
in such a situation:
"[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See."
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)
Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said "the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church."
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]
- "If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html
- "Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html
- LifeSiteNews, "Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial
weight behind communion for adulterers," December 4, 2017:
The AAS guidelines explicitly allows "sexually active adulterous couples
facing 'complex circumstances' to 'access the sacraments of
Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'"
- On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:
"The AAS statement... establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia
has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense."
- On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:
"Francis' heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the
Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters
magisterial documents."
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.
Election Notes:
- Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: "212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted...Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden" [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]
- Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times "Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003": http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1