Skip to main content

Might Biden not Oppose Barrett because she agrees with Roberts' Unconstitutional Democrat "Pro-Lockdown Decision"?

 https://media.breitbart.com/media/2020/09/moscow-idaho-psalm-sing-arrest-640x480.jpg

"A sharply divided Supreme Court late Friday turned aside a church's urgent plea that California's coronavirus lockdown orders are putting an unconstitutional burden on religious freedom."

"Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the court's liberals in rejecting a San Diego church's request for relief from Gov. Gavin Newsom's most recent directive limiting churches to 25% of their normal maximum capacity, with an absolute maximum of 100 people at any service." [https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/29/supreme-court-denies-illinois-churches-lockdown-relief-290185]

 

On September 29, Newsweek reported that "Joe Biden [was] not opposed to Amy Coney Barrett, say[ing] she 'seems like a very fine person.'" [https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-not-opposed-amy-coney-barrett-says-she-seems-like-very-fine-person-1535156]

Might Biden not oppose Barrett because she agrees with liberal Justice John Roberts on his unconstitutional Democrat "pro-lockdown decision"?

Will an Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court allow arresting people for attending church?

Lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and constitutional law reports that "Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh & Thomas... refutes and directly disagrees w/ the [Roberts and] #Barrett pro-lockdown decision":

Read the excellent opinion by Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh & Thomas, that refutes and directly disagrees w/ the #Barrett pro-lockdown decision: "it is a mistake to take language in Jacobson as the last word on what the Constitution allows." supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf [https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law]

 Is Barrett another Roberts who will allow arresting people for attending church?

On Twitter, WindTalker put it best on the irony of "the police are NOT going to protect our cities from rioting, looting and... arresting peaceful churchgoers:

WindTalker
@nmlinguaphile
·
Well, since
WindTalker
@nmlinguaphile
·

Well, since the police are NOT going to protect our cities from rioting, looting and mayhem, at least arresting people for attending church gives “law” enforcement something to do. Much less work arresting peaceful churchgoers too. Such “brave” officers. twitter.com/michaelcoudrey… [https://twitter.com/mrtnzfred]ment something to do. Much less work arresting peaceful churchgoers too. Such “brave” officers. twitter.com/michaelcoudrey… [Retweet: https://twitter.com/mrtnzfred]

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

 


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Remember when Trump was up by 600,000 votes in Pennsylvania?": A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

  Matthew H @MattH_4America Remember when Trump was up by 600,000 votes in Pennsylvania? 1:07 PM · Jul 13, 2022 · Twitter Web App [https://twitter.com/MattH_4America/status/1547311877264400384] 10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborator

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Alone Bishop Gracida openly proclaims "Resist!" & Actively Works towards the Removal of Francis

    "You cannot give Holy Communion to the abortionists, to the abortion promoters and providers, to the divorce and remarried. You cannot do it. St. Paul said you do not feed the Eucharist to dogs..."   "Right now they [the laity] are suffering in silence. They need to object. The laity, the sensus fidelium is that common sense among the laity who have accepted the magisterial teaching of the Church which is the foundation of their faith."     "Having accepted that when they hear something that is contradictory to the magisterial teaching of the Church, the sensus fidelium is a impulse that causes them to speak out and say no."     "That is not true. Don't say that. Stop! That is the sensus fidelium in action!"     "Not to sit and suffer in silence. That's crazy. That's weird. That's wrong. Speak up! Resist! " - Bishop Rene Gracida [ https://youtu.be/arF9TlUVfiU ] We are in the greatest crisis in the history