Skip to main content

Might Biden not Oppose Barrett because she agrees with Roberts' Unconstitutional Democrat "Pro-Lockdown Decision"?

 https://media.breitbart.com/media/2020/09/moscow-idaho-psalm-sing-arrest-640x480.jpg

"A sharply divided Supreme Court late Friday turned aside a church's urgent plea that California's coronavirus lockdown orders are putting an unconstitutional burden on religious freedom."

"Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the court's liberals in rejecting a San Diego church's request for relief from Gov. Gavin Newsom's most recent directive limiting churches to 25% of their normal maximum capacity, with an absolute maximum of 100 people at any service." [https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/29/supreme-court-denies-illinois-churches-lockdown-relief-290185]

 

On September 29, Newsweek reported that "Joe Biden [was] not opposed to Amy Coney Barrett, say[ing] she 'seems like a very fine person.'" [https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-not-opposed-amy-coney-barrett-says-she-seems-like-very-fine-person-1535156]

Might Biden not oppose Barrett because she agrees with liberal Justice John Roberts on his unconstitutional Democrat "pro-lockdown decision"?

Will an Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court allow arresting people for attending church?

Lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and constitutional law reports that "Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh & Thomas... refutes and directly disagrees w/ the [Roberts and] #Barrett pro-lockdown decision":

Read the excellent opinion by Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh & Thomas, that refutes and directly disagrees w/ the #Barrett pro-lockdown decision: "it is a mistake to take language in Jacobson as the last word on what the Constitution allows." supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf [https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law]

 Is Barrett another Roberts who will allow arresting people for attending church?

On Twitter, WindTalker put it best on the irony of "the police are NOT going to protect our cities from rioting, looting and... arresting peaceful churchgoers:

WindTalker
@nmlinguaphile
·
Well, since
WindTalker
@nmlinguaphile
·

Well, since the police are NOT going to protect our cities from rioting, looting and mayhem, at least arresting people for attending church gives “law” enforcement something to do. Much less work arresting peaceful churchgoers too. Such “brave” officers. twitter.com/michaelcoudrey… [https://twitter.com/mrtnzfred]ment something to do. Much less work arresting peaceful churchgoers too. Such “brave” officers. twitter.com/michaelcoudrey… [Retweet: https://twitter.com/mrtnzfred]

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

 


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 | cocatholicconference.org   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. pic.twitter.com/npCuPzdnxP — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2021/08/what-could-be-so-important-that-francis.html] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[https://catholicherald.co.uk/roman-curia-the-popes-new-right-hand-man/] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul