Premiere Lawyer Barnes: "Attorney General Barr Strongly Disagreed w/ #Barrett, calling the Lockdown Orders the Worst Violation of Civil Rights in American History since Slavery"

Today, premiere lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and constitutional law reported on Twitter that Attorney General William Barr "strongly disagreed" with Amy Coney Barrett's "lockdown orders [ruling which are] the worst violation of civil rights in American history since slavery."

The Barrett lockdown ruling apparently may be anti-U. S. Constitution according to Barnes:

"A reminder: Attorney General Barr strongly disagreed w/ #Barrett, calling the lockdown orders the worst violation of civil rights in American history since slavery."

"One of the lies being spread to support #Barrett is that her lockdown opinion didn't say anything about the US Constitution. The #Barrett pro-lockdown ruling made very clear it 'took off the table' ANY challenge to ANY lockdown order based on ANY claim of 'protection of liberty.'" [Robert Barnes on Twitter: "A reminder: Attorney General Barr strongly disagreed w/ #Barrett, calling the lockdown orders: https://mobile.twitter.com/barnes_law/status/1308232572841783296?prefetchtimestamp=1600797976606 and https://mobile.twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1308583930006843393]

(The Avvo.com lawyer directory reports that attorney "Robert Barnes embraces the challenge to defend the little guy and stand up for what is right... After receiving a fellowship to the law school at the University of Wisconsin where he graduated with honors and myriad awards for academic excellence... Mr. Barnes has earned a reputation as a premiere lawyer.") [https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/90017-ca-robert-barnes-1518666.html]

Moreover, yesterday, the Catholic Monitor reported, in terms of the civil rights of unborn babies, that Amy Coney Barrett may possibly be semi-pro-abortion because "Barrett said she would 'follow all Supreme Court precedent without fail' and would regard decisions such as Roe v. Wade as binding precedent" according to the Voice of America:

"Republicans view her as reliably conservative and a future Supreme Court vote to overturn the landmark 1973 decision legalizing abortion rights in the U.S., but Barrett has offered conflicting comments on how she might vote on abortion cases."

"During her confirmation hearing to the appeals court, Barrett said she would 'follow all Supreme Court precedent without fail' and would regard decisions such as Roe v. Wade as binding precedent.

“I would never impose my own personal convictions upon the law,” she said.

"But she also has written that judges should not be held to upholding Supreme Court precedents, such as the abortion decision." [https://www.voanews.com/usa/three-conservative-female-judges-top-trumps-supreme-court-list and
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/09/voice-of-america-possibly-semi-pro.html?m=1]

Yesterday, the Monitor received an email from an internationally known attorney. The lawyer who wishes to remain anonymous, in a response to the report mentioned above which speculated that "Barrett may possibly be semi-pro-abortion," said:

"The Catholic Monitor is correct. Also, Barrett wrote a terrible decision supporting Democrat Governor Pritzger’s draconian shutdown. I am told that the opinion is terribly argued and very problematic. The fawning over Barrett by non lawyers and all these Catholic bloggers is very troubling. They don’t have legal knowledge of her decisions."

"We must also remember that Notre Dame honored Barack Obama and Ted McCarrick. It has hired Pete Buttigieg to teach there. It seems like the ND public relations machine is in over drive to name Amy [who has taught at the Notre Dame Law School]. We need a pro-life jurist who can get the Senate confirmation. The Cuban Latina Barbara Lagoa might be more difficult for the Democrats to vote against. She might even eek out a Democrat vote or two. I know the strong Notre Dame connection as well as clout and so my reflex reaction is not to trust it." [Here’s a link to "Barrett['s]... terrible decision supporting Democrat Governor Pritzger’s draconian shutdown": https://cookcountyrecord.com/stories/553524774-appeals-court-pritzker-ok-to-limit-or-not-limit-religious-political-gatherings-to-combat-covid-19]

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

Deliverance Prayers II The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...

Has the Trad Media fallen into a COVID-like mass formation with "the Uncola or 'UnFrancis'" Leo XVI? While it's humorous to see the former anti-Francis Trad pundits suddenly acting like teen age girls infatuated with Leo, it could lead to a Trojan Horse effect

May 2023-Cardinal Robert Prevost Honorary Doctorate from the Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo (USAT). Posted by Elizabeth Yore... ... Frankly, it’s shocking and inconceivable that a newly elected pontiff would cite as his guiding light the theology of Joseph Bernardin, a known sexual predator and radical collaborator of Marxist and community activist, Saul Alinsky... ... Bernardin and the Alinsky... gave birth to the moral relativism of Bernardin’s seamless garment religion, which is referenced in Prevost’s speech. Prevost espouses the “seamless garment” radical ideology of Cardinal Joseph Bernardin , former Archbishop of Chicago. It is long overdue that American Catholics wake up about the real Joseph Bernardin . [ https://www.yorechildren.com/blog/2025/5/20/the-chicago-way] It is difficult to capture all the arresting insights of Desmet’s rewarding book, which includes the startling claim that [COVID] tyrannical leaders are, very often, themselves captive t...

The Catholic Monitor

Search This Blog