Skip to main content

Premiere Lawyer Barnes: "Attorney General Barr Strongly Disagreed w/ #Barrett, calling the Lockdown Orders the Worst Violation of Civil Rights in American History since Slavery"

Today, premiere lawyer Robert Barnes who deals in civil, criminal and constitutional law reported on Twitter that Attorney General William Barr "strongly disagreed" with Amy Coney Barrett's "lockdown orders [ruling which are] the worst violation of civil rights in American history since slavery.

The Barrett lockdown ruling apparently may be anti-U. S. Constitution according to Barnes:

"A reminder: Attorney General Barr strongly disagreed w/ #Barrett, calling the lockdown orders the worst violation of civil rights in American history since slavery."

"One of the lies being spread to support #Barrett is that her lockdown opinion didn't say anything about the US Constitution. The #Barrett pro-lockdown ruling made very clear it 'took off the table' ANY challenge to ANY lockdown order based on ANY claim of 'protection of liberty.'" [Robert Barnes on Twitter: "A reminder: Attorney General Barr strongly disagreed w/ #Barrett, calling the lockdown orders: https://mobile.twitter.com/barnes_law/status/1308232572841783296?prefetchtimestamp=1600797976606 and https://mobile.twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1308583930006843393] 
 
(The Avvo.com lawyer directory reports that attorney "Robert Barnes embraces the challenge to defend the little guy and stand up for what is right... After receiving a fellowship to the law school at the University of Wisconsin where he graduated with honors and myriad awards for academic excellence... Mr. Barnes has earned a reputation as a premiere lawyer.") [https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/90017-ca-robert-barnes-1518666.html] 
 
Moreover, yesterday, the Catholic Monitor reported, in terms of the civil rights of unborn babies, that Amy Coney Barrett may possibly be semi-pro-abortion because "Barrett said she would 'follow all Supreme Court precedent without fail' and would regard decisions such as Roe v. Wade as binding precedent" according to the Voice of America:

"Republicans view her as reliably conservative and a future Supreme Court vote to overturn the landmark 1973 decision legalizing abortion rights in the U.S., but Barrett has offered conflicting comments on how she might vote on abortion cases."

"During her confirmation hearing to the appeals court, Barrett said she would 'follow all Supreme Court precedent without fail' and would regard decisions such as Roe v. Wade as binding precedent.

“I would never impose my own personal convictions upon the law,” she said.

"But she also has written that judges should not be held to upholding Supreme Court precedents, such as the abortion decision." [https://www.voanews.com/usa/three-conservative-female-judges-top-trumps-supreme-court-list and
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/09/voice-of-america-possibly-semi-pro.html?m=1]

Yesterday, the Monitor received an email from an internationally known attorney. The lawyer who wishes to remain anonymous, in a response to the report mentioned above which speculated that "Barrett may possibly be semi-pro-abortion," said:

"The Catholic Monitor is correct. Also, Barrett wrote a terrible decision supporting Democrat Governor Pritzger’s draconian shutdown. I am told that the opinion is terribly argued and very problematic. The fawning over Barrett by non lawyers and all these Catholic bloggers is very troubling. They don’t have legal knowledge of her decisions."

"We must also remember that Notre Dame honored Barack Obama and Ted McCarrick. It has hired Pete Buttigieg to teach there. It seems like the ND public relations machine is in over drive to name Amy [who has taught at the Notre Dame Law School]. We need a pro-life jurist who can get the Senate confirmation. The Cuban Latina Barbara Lagoa might be more difficult for the Democrats to vote against. She might even eek out a Democrat vote or two. I know the strong Notre Dame connection as well as clout and so my reflex reaction is not to trust it." [Here’s a link to "Barrett['s]... terrible decision supporting Democrat Governor Pritzger’s draconian shutdown"https://cookcountyrecord.com/stories/553524774-appeals-court-pritzker-ok-to-limit-or-not-limit-religious-political-gatherings-to-combat-covid-19] 

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Remember when Trump was up by 600,000 votes in Pennsylvania?": A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

  Matthew H @MattH_4America Remember when Trump was up by 600,000 votes in Pennsylvania? 1:07 PM · Jul 13, 2022 · Twitter Web App [https://twitter.com/MattH_4America/status/1547311877264400384] 10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborator

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Alone Bishop Gracida openly proclaims "Resist!" & Actively Works towards the Removal of Francis

    "You cannot give Holy Communion to the abortionists, to the abortion promoters and providers, to the divorce and remarried. You cannot do it. St. Paul said you do not feed the Eucharist to dogs..."   "Right now they [the laity] are suffering in silence. They need to object. The laity, the sensus fidelium is that common sense among the laity who have accepted the magisterial teaching of the Church which is the foundation of their faith."     "Having accepted that when they hear something that is contradictory to the magisterial teaching of the Church, the sensus fidelium is a impulse that causes them to speak out and say no."     "That is not true. Don't say that. Stop! That is the sensus fidelium in action!"     "Not to sit and suffer in silence. That's crazy. That's weird. That's wrong. Speak up! Resist! " - Bishop Rene Gracida [ https://youtu.be/arF9TlUVfiU ] We are in the greatest crisis in the history