Skip to main content

Why doesn't Church Militant's Voris call Opus Dei & Francis's Vatican Cult-like?

Church Militant has called SSPX Bishop Bernard Fellay a "big liar" who "needs to be expelled" for sex-abuse cover-up and has said that the Society of St. Puis X (SSPX) supporters are a "cult." [https://twitter.com/Michael_Voris/status/1293576524751409152

Why can't Church Militant call Francis a "big liar" who "needs to be expelled" and why doesn't Michael Voris call the Francis Vatican cult-like when it does cover-up of sex abuse?

Don't Voris and his collaborators really care about the victims and are they soft on pedo-protectors when it comes to Francis's Vatican cover-up victims?

Why are Francis conservatives so soft when it comes to pedo exposure and removal of Francis as well as his apparent cult-like Vatican?

I am waiting for Voris' Church Militant to do a months in the making investigation of Francis and his inner circle leadership's sex-abuse cover-ups. And I'm not talking about phony Church Militant puff pieces such as "Mother Alleges Sex Abuse Cover-Up Under Cdl. Bergoglio" that cover-up as much as they expose of Francis' "constant protection" of the clerical gay mafia in Argentina. [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/05/why-was-church-militant-apparently.html?m=1]

Why hasn't Church Militant send a reporter or even called the Argentinian Wanderer to expose Francis?

The Catholic Argentinian website the Wanderer on October 23, 2014 posted "Unmasking Bergoglio":

"Bergoglio always had the 'gay agenda' among his plans... It is a question of asking the Buenoairean clergy about the constant protection that he lavished on many homosexual priests."

Voris will gently and mildly say "abusive homosexual bishop like Zanchetta, Piñeda or Maccarone, or a predator priest like Grassi, Inzoli or Corradi... escape criticism from the Pope [Francis]," but never will he say Francis's Vatican leadership is cult-like and "needs to be expelled" if guilty:

"If you are an abusive homosexual bishop like Zanchetta, Piñeda or Maccarone, or a predator priest like Grassi, Inzoli or Corradi, might you feel betrayed if a fellow cleric whom you knew shared your homosexual orientation came out with a statement condemning those who engage in homosexual behavior? Why does a cardinal like Francesco Coccopalmerio, whom multiple sources confirm attended a "drug-fueled homosexual party" in the Vatican, escape criticism from the Pope, who personally made the apartment available to Coccopalmerio's secretary, Msgr. Luigi Capozzi?"

Moreover, I am waiting for Voris to do a months in the making investigation into Opus Dei (OD) which apparently supports the Francis Vatican's agenda.

Opus Dei investigator Randy Engel says:

"Voris promotes and defends Opus Dei."

Yes, I am aware of the Church Militant of Nice softball article that Voris did on OD which between compliments briefly went over some of its sex abuse scandals.

Voris knows Engel so he just has to call or email her and she can help him in his new months in the making investigation of his friends at big money Opus Dei.

I think if Opus Dei's leadership is guilty they "need... to be expelled."

Instead, Voris in a video titled "The Answer," reposted by Restore-DC-Catholicism, said:

"As far as I can see Opus Dei which means the work of God is if not the answer is at least the best that I can see.
(Church Militant, "The Answer," 4:44-4:52 which was posted on Restore-DC-Catholicism, "The "Answer" according to Real Catholic TV, March 25, 2010)

In the above post, Restore-DC-Catholicism said former members of Opus Dei "relay their stories of how they were subject to subtle thought reform and increasing mental control."

Why doesn't Michael Voris call  Opus Dei cult-like?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Comments

The Bear said…
Just a reminder: the Jay report data conclusively proves the sex abuse crisis was homosexual predation against adolescent boys. This is not pedophilia. Pedophiles go young—often extremely young—and are often indifferent as to boys or girls. Homosexual predators are entirely different. They have no remorse because they actually have convinced themselves they’re not hurting anything. Just a pet peeve of mine because I have much legal experience with both types of offenders. If we do not correctly identify the problem—homosexual clerics—we get muddled and ineffective. I am certain the media has pushed “pedophilia” to cover homosexual predators. And no one say, well the Jay report says it wasn’t homosexuals. Yeah, they do say that. Their own data refutes that claim beyond dispute. The vast majority of victims are of a certain age and male—pubescent. This is classic predatory homosexual behavior. Not pedophilia. Two totally different things, mentalities, MOs, offenders, victims.

Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 | cocatholicconference.org   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. pic.twitter.com/npCuPzdnxP — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2021/08/what-could-be-so-important-that-francis.html] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[https://catholicherald.co.uk/roman-curia-the-popes-new-right-hand-man/] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul