Skip to main content

Is the Coronavirus "Statistically... Exceptional" enough to Impose Martial Law?

Today, in Germany there was real debate between pulmonologist specialist Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and the website which is called Mimikana.

The website presents Dr. Wodarg's position as the Coronavirus "is not statistically as exceptional as it is presented: Without tests, nobody would notice that SARS-CoV-2 existed at all... In fact, we don't see an increase at this point - in Europe!"

Mimikana admits this is apparently true, but says the "real comparison, we have to use are the mortality rates in China" which are apparently approximately 6 times higher than normal according to the chart they presented.
(Mimikana, "Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg is an internist and pulmonologist, that is, a specialist. However, his statements cause discussion.," March 17, 2020)

The website article is an attempt to refute Wodarg's position and ends with the conclusion that:

"The claim that the current quarantine measures are nonsensical and exaggerated cannot be confirmed... other experts show quite clearly that it is dangerous to underestimate SARS- CoV- 2."

"Apart from that, there is another danger... that of mutation! The more a virus spreads, the greater the likelihood that it will mutate."

The last sentence made me laugh because even I know that all viruses mutate. That's what they do.

Live Science said:

The new coronavirus, like all other viruses, mutate, or undergoes small changes in its genome. A recently published study suggests... [it] had already mutated into one more or one less aggressive strain. But experts aren't convinced."

"... Nathan Grubaugh, an epidemiologist... the authors' conclusions are 'pure speculation.'"
(Live Science, "How fast can the coronavirus mutate?," March 6, 2020, 11 days ago)

Moreover, Dr. Wodarg in his website wodarg.com reported a stunning revelation from the "important Italian [new agency] source" Agenzia Nova dated March 13, 2020:

"Coronavirus: ISS, in Italy there are only two deaths ascertained so far due to Covid-19:

'Rome, 13 Mar 19:12 - (Agenzia Nova) - There may be only two people who died from coronavirus in Italy, who did not to present other pathologies. This is what emerges from the medical records examined so far by the Higher Institute of Health, according to the President of the Institute, Silvio.'"
(www.wodarg.com, wolfgang wodarg Q&A - typical questions and answers: COVID19 in Italy?)

Why can't we in the United States have a real debate on the Coronavirus before we suspend Masses and impose martial law-like edicts?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as for the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.


Comments

Alexis Bugnolo said…
The reason why discussions are not allowed over measures taken by Lefties is that Lefties believe that they are the only gods which exist, and as a principle do not admit that you question their divinity. We saw this already on the interpretation of Feb. 11, 2013.
lynn said…
Amen. I have seen the video by Dr. Wodarg, Stunning insights into the coronavirus panic.
Also recommend Jon Rappoport's Nomorefakenews. Especially his look into the Italian death toll
whereby a Italian health official publicly admits that only two of the deaths can be attributed to the new virus...maybe...all the other deaths have occured in patients with the average age of over 80 and they all have had compromised immune systems.
By getting us all to agree to self-containment for a virus, they are assured of our compliance when they impose martial law on us for some other reason.

If the truth of the Chinese/globalist plan comes out, it may awaken more people to the hidden plans they have laid for the citizens of the free world.
Praypraypray said…
It’s madness! We should be having more Masses like the Catholics in Poland. This has been blown all out of proportion!

This is a good analysis of what’s really going on and how it’s being skewed to scare people. https://wmbriggs.com/post/29830/

And it’s so scary to see how easily sheeple are frightened and easily comply. What’s worse, is that they have to try to tell themselves and others that somehow this is a good thing, that they stopped all public Masses. Well, evil begets evil. The pollyannish nonsense coming from scared sheeple online and offline is pathetic. I guess it’s a psychological phenomenon in which they try to soothe themselves by wishful thinking and fantasy talk that a bad thing will magically turn into a good thing. It seems that they cannot allow themselves to think that it’s really a bad thing to stop public Masses or that it could cause further problems or damage. That would be too stressful for them and so it does not compute!

That reminds me of the people making negative personal attacks on anyone who dares to question the validity of Pope Benedict’s resignation/ abdication. They cannot allow that thought to enter their minds. Therefore, they only associate with other like minded scared people and make personal attacks on anyone who does not agree with them.
john said…
The bishops and most of the clergy are enjoying their "vacation' from Lent, Holy Week. Heck, most of them have probably "exempted" themselves from all Masses.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...