Skip to main content

1P5 Skojec & Francis Bishops must Stop Eating because "it's Possible for the [Food] to carry Pathogens"

One Peter Five's publisher Steve Skojec in his alliance with the Francis bishops has a promotional campaign to ban public Masses that is relentless.

On March 20, he did a promotional post for this campaign at his blog titled "R4R # 41: Coronavirus w/ Steve Skojec."  In the comment section, Skojec said:

"I've had discussions with folks who believe it's not possible for the host to carry pathogens. And there are some bishops who apparently agree:

"Bishop Eleganti in Switzerland... "

"This is incorrect, theologically, and needs to be addressed."

I have news for Skojec who apparently hasn't stopped eating:

Every last piece of food that he stuffs into his mouth "possibly" is carrying "pathogens."

For the good of humanity and to stop the spread of the Coronavirus, Skojec and the Francis bishops must stop putting on their tongues that dangerous food which is "possibly" carrying "pathogens."

Moreover, Skojec must widen his prohibition promotional campaign to include in his ban McDonald hamburgers, pizza delivery and grocery stores because those dangerous people who "possibly" may carry "pathogens" didn't keep social distance from the dangerous food which itself may "possibly" carry "pathogens."

Remember that what he said about the Holy Eucharist, Food for the soul, is also true of all food.

According to Skojec's logic than all food must be banned because it is "possibly" carrying "pathogens" and if you don't believe this you are a heretic according to the Francis traditionalist creed because such a heretical belief is:

"[I]ncorrect, theologically, and needs to be addressed."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Mass and Church as well as for the Triumph of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.

Also, pray an Our Father now for President Trump for the grace to do God's will in this crisis.


Debbie said…
Hahaha...Steve tweeted yesterday about a funky smell in his garage. Turns out he/they left a box of meat (prep for coronavirus) there and it spoiled. Must be nice to have so much it wasn't noticed. Any Catholic still listening to him let alone donating to 1P5 needs to re-think things.
Aqua said…
What does it profit a man to gain the whole world, but lose his soul. (Mark 8:36)

Safety for the body, but eternal damnation for the soul. Food for the belly, starvation for the soul. Lent and Easter is our pinnacle and to miss it is to commit mortal sin. We have abandoned Christ on His Cross. He could endure suffering and death. Safety, food and comfort for us.

I choose Christ. Even if He slay me, yet will I trust Him (Job 13:15)
lynn said…
Sabbatean Frankism rules the narrative.
Alexis Bugnolo said…
Steve and his ilk are not opposed to what is on the outside of the Eucharit, but Who is on the Inside, to speak in a crude manner.
Fr. VF said…
The problem is that the majority of people who receive on the tongue don't know how. They keep their eyes open and try to "take" the Host with their tongue. That's when they lick the priest's fingers. Or they rise up on their toes to help the priest find their mouth. The communicant should have his head back, and his tongue flat AND MOTIONLESS.
Alexis Bugnolo said…
Father VF,

Can you explain to me why the last time I heard a priest explain that, was at my first communion?
Aqua said…
Br Bugnolo: I always appreciate good catechesis from our Priests and Religious. I appreciate Fr. VFs reminder. And I appreciate your own encouragement to add Catechesis to a (largely) ignorant flock of Laymen. We have much, much to learn. Your own blog, at FromRome, has excellent topics (your latest, “how to pray” is especially important and timely to me). One of your previous, examination of conscience, was also much appreciated.

I try to catechize myself, but as you have previously said, that is potentially dangerous and prone to error if not checked by those who know (should know). I (we) can easily get into the weeds if not careful. My experience is that practical Catechesis is severely lacking at the ground level - Catechesis such as that by Fr. VF, above (thanks again for the reminder, which is important).

So, I’ll take all the correction and direction I can get, and will continue to support your FromRome blog (and Mr. Martinez’s CatholicMonitor) as it is an essential spiritual service.

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk