Skip to main content

Why is Francis's Reportedly "Gay Lobby" Private Secretary "leav[ing] his Position"?

Vatican News reported Msgr. Fabian Pedacchio the "Pope's personal secretary to leave his position" with Francis.
(Vatican News, "Pope's personal secretary to leave his position," November 25, 2019)

AdnKronos.com said Pedacchio's resignation was accelerated for unknown reasons:

"[A]n acceleration in his replacement for reasons which are still unclear."
(Gloria.tv, "Francis' Private Secretary about to Resign," November 24, 2019)

Might his resignation be connected to his reportedly being a member of the Vatican "gay lobby" and issues dealing with that immoral membership?

In 2013, at the beginning of Francis's pontificate according to the Monday Vatican blog, known for its insider knowledge of the Vatican, Francis was already reportedly promoting the gay lobby which included Pedacchio:

"Ilson de Jesus Montanari... catapulted to the number two position in the Congregation for Bishops... rumored to be a close friend of Msgr. Fabian Pedacchio Leaniz... the Pope's personal secretary... [by] Battista Ricca... [Ilson was]... introduced to Cardinal Bergoglio... Was also Ilson part of the gay lobby as Ricca was accused to be?.. Ricca was appointed ... prelate of the IOR... [Is the] Pope Francis... promotion of people presumably part of a gay lobby... a strategy to keep everyone under control?"
(Monday Vatican, "Pope Francis wants to govern the Curia. And possibly with an absent Secretary of State," October 21, 2013)

Gay activist Frederic Martel in his Vatican book wrote of the "magic circle" hotel which is run by Ricca who is "presumably part of a gay lobby" whom Francis promoted:

"The director of the Casa [del Clero] and all the Vatican residences, Mgr. Battista Ricca, also lives there... you can also bump into Fabian Pedacchio, a private secretary to Pope Francis, who has lived at the Domus for a long time, and who is said to keep a room where he is able to work calmly with the Brazilian bishop Ilson de Jesus Montanari... A couple of boys, dinkies and bio-queens who listen to Born this Way by Lady Gaga, live there too... A Basque priest also enjoys some delightful associations within this 'magic circle'... sometimes, holy offices have been celebrated by gay groups."
(In the Closet of the Vatican: Power, Homosexuality, Hypocrisy, Pages 305-306)

When Pedacchio Leaniz and Montanari apparently aren't at the "magic circle" hotel room in Rome they "spend holidays together":

"Pedacchio... the Pope's private secretary, Pedacchio and Montanari are... great friends; they also spend holidays together, and in the past years Pedacchio introduced Montanari to familiarity with what would become pope."
(La Stampa, "Bishops, the mystery revealed...," 10/16/2013)

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò in his September 27 statement said Cardinal Marc Ouellet, the Perfect of the Congregation for Bishops, is undermined "by two homosexual 'friends' of his dicastery."

Vatican expert Marco Tosatti according to Gloria.tv reported how Francis's "private secretary" (and Montanari) apparently undermine Ouellet:

"Ouellet categorically excluded one of them [from episcopal nomination] for moral reasons. But the next day Pedacchio told Ouellet, 'The Pope wants him."
(Gloria.tv, "Two Homosexuals are bypassing Cardinal Ouellet," September 28, 2018)

If Viganò's and Tosatti's reports are true then apparently Francis's allegedly gay private secretary helps him appoint morally questionable bishops.

Are Francis and his allegedly gay private secretary expanding the gay lobby by appointing and promoting gay bishops?

Is there growing evidence that Francis may be a member of the gay lobby?

Remember the question asked by the Monday Vatican:

"Was also Ilson part of the gay lobby as Ricca was accused to be?"

Is it possible also that Francis is part of the gay lobby as his soon to be former private secretary is accused to be?

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Comments

BrotherBeowulf said…
St Andrew’s Day/Vigil Advent

Francis is the head of the clerical Homosexual Network Strangling the Church.

The facts of the past two years clearly confirm the statement. He himself has admitted it by his absolute silence and failure to respond at all to Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò’s August 2018 testimony accusing Francis of that very thing. All he did was attempt to kill the messenger by slander, the slanderous lies of ad hominem attack on the great and valiant archbishop.

I’d be happy to list 2 or 3 dozen corroborating actions by Bergoglio himself confirming his status as chief of the clerical Homosexual Network Strangling the Church, if anyone wishes for the depressing refresher.

BrotherBeowulf said…
Please start the Rosary, ideally a Novena honoring the Immaculate Heart as we lead up to the Feast of the Immaculate Conception.
BrotherBeowulf said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
BrotherBeowulf said…
I’ve often thought it’s Francis or Fatima. Meaning the triumph of the Immaculate Heart will vanquish all the sin crime error apostasy and heresy of the Bergoglian regime.

Because our beautiful Lady will strike the serpent’s head and crush it. Then Bergoglio will be out of a job, if his sorry apostate hide is not collateral damage himself.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...