Skip to main content

Francis/Fr. Martin "Propaganda" used by "Homopredator Priest" to Groom Sex Abuse Victim

Today, Fr. John Zuhlsdorf spoke of a "Special Report: Inside the Mind of a Homopredator Priest":

"[T]his perverted, twisted, probably possessed priest [Fr. Robert Deland presently in Michigan State Prison was caught on tape grooming a sex abuse victim using]... manipulations... [that] sounded very much like the homosexualist propaganda of a highly visible Jesuit [Fr. James Martin].... 'It's okay to feel this way... Be who you are! I love you anyway.'"
(Fr. Z's Blog, "@Church_Miltant report on a twisted priest-predator has a familiar ring," May, 23, 2019)

The Pope Francis appointed Vatican consultant Fr. James Martin's bridge to hell propaganda becomes even more clear when you substitute the word sex abuser for LGBT and his other gay activist language as quoted from his WMOF speech in the Catholic Herald:

- Headline: "Fr. James Martin critiques 'sex-abuserphobic' pastors at WMOF"

- "'[W]elcome sex abuser persons'... into parish life."

- "Don't reduce sex abuser people to the call to chastity."

-"The priest said those with 'sex-abuserphobic' pastors, 'either silently or overtly,' are 'out of luck.'"

-"[L]isten to sex abuser parishioners;. 'trust that the Holy Spirit will guide them'... rather than 'simply repeating Church teachings without considering their sex abuse lived experience."
(Catholic Herald, August 23, 2017)

Don't forget Church Militant's September 20, 2017 headline where we substitute sex abuser for homosexual:

- "Father Martin: Sex abusers not Bound to Chastity"

The point is there is no reason under the sun not to justify sex abuser behavior if one uses Martin and Francis language or propaganda in justifying gay behavior in the Church.

There is no reason not to justify sex abuse crimes using Francis/Martin-speak when one substitutes sex abuser for gay:

- "Who am I to judge" sex abusers.

- "God made you like this" sex abuser.

- That is the "lived experience" of sex abusers.

- Sex abuser "discrimination... should be avoided."

Here is one that even conservative Catholics were using in the earlier part of the McCarrick scandal:

"It is consensual" so it's not that big a deal and can be taken care of in the confessional.

What Fr. Z said of Martin applies to Francis:

"[T]his is part of a larger, concerted effort to normalize sodomy, which is a sin that 'cries to heaven'... Martin's talk is a nightmare of manipulation and misdirection... they use 'lived experience' to justify whatever the hell they want."
(Fr.Z's Blog, "@JamesMartinSJ talk at #WMOF18," August 23, 2018)

The Francis/Martin language "is a nightmare of manipulation and misdirection" that is a bridge to hell.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more