Skip to main content

Are Francis and his Gay Inner Circle Protecting Wuerl who Covered-up for "an Alleged Priest-run Child Porn Ring" and the Pro-Gay Bishops Network?

Why are Pope Francis and his gay inner circle protecting Cardinal Wuerl who covered-up "an alleged priest-run child porn ring"? (Washington Post, The con man in the cardinal's cap," August 22, 2018, by Hugh Hewitt)

The papal inner circle of Francis's "closest collaborators and confidants" includes Vatican Bank Msgr. Battista Ricca of the alleged "gay affairs" scandal who houses the Pope in his Vatican hotel, Vice-Pope Cardinal Rodriguez Maradiaga of the gay Honduras seminary scandal, C9 Cardinal Ezzati who is Francis's collaborator of the Chile gay Barros scandal and confidant Cardinal Coccopalmerio's secretary of the gay drug/orgy scandal which happened a few 100 yards away from where Francis lives in gay Ricca's hotel.

These are only some of the names.

According to Vatican expert Sandro Magister, Francis has a "number of homosexual priests in his [Vatican] inner circle of closest collaborators and confidants."(Magister's Chiesa.com, December 16, 2016)

Did Francis's gay inner circle write the phony strawman letter blaming "clericalism" and the"Church," but not any of the priests in the Pennsylvania sex abuse report, not any of Wuerl's pro-gay bishops cover-up network and not any of Francis's pro-gay Vatican cover-up inner circle?

In the Washington Post, Hugh Hewitt put it best:

"[H]is boss [Francis] in Rome wrote a pablum-filled letter [of]... 'everybody is to blame' mea non-culpa [Latin for "but not my fault"] from Pope Francis, his name is on it too. Wuerl needs to resign. And the church would be better off with two retired popes and a new man absolutely dedicated to supporting the reformers, not suppressing them."

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Francis teaches HERESY," now, the question is will he do a Skojec & a Schneider Cop Out

    Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation: "[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic , he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him , or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See." (The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306) Taylor Marshall finally admitted that "Pope Francis teaches HERESY: Pope Pius XII condemned the heresy of Francis": Pope Francis on Feb 2 2022, taught, "that in Christ no one can ever truly separate us from those we love because the bond is an existential bond, a strong bond that is in our very nature...who have denied the faith, who are apostates." Pope Pius XII taught the exact opposite when he wrote of those: "who have not been so unfortunate as to separate themselves from the unity of the Body, or b

Wernz-Vidal: "One cannot consider as Schismatics those who Refuse to Obey the Roman Pontiff because they would hold his person Suspect or, because of Widespread Rumors, Doubtfully Elected"

    Pope Francis is tottering on the precipice of Hell. None of this means he isn't the pope, and such talk among the laity is scandalous in its own right. Not a single cardinal in that 2013 conclave has come out and said the election was rigged and Bergoglio isn't the pope, that he is in fact an anti-pope . If he is, a future pope can declare that, when Jorge Bergoglio will no longer be a pope. But if the very men gathered in conclave haven't made that public accusation,  anyone who is suggesting that better take into account that they too will have to give an account of themselves to Almighty God when they die . Such talk adds to the scandal of the "little ones," the simple, even potential converts, who, when they hear big-mouth Catholics on social media saying he's not really the pope, draw back from approaching the Church. Do any of us desire to stand in front Our Blessed Lord as the Supreme Judge and explain why, in our desire for more c

The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”

Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk