Skip to main content

Hellgate has Cardinals and Laity Rebelling against Pope Francis and those who Spin Heretical Statements Attributed to him which he still hasn't Publicly Denied

Vatican expert Antonio Socci reported that an "important (non-Italian) Cardinal" and "several of his colleagues," apparently Cardinals, are rebelling against the present scandalous papacy and have threatened a possible "impeachment" or to deposed Pope Francis from the Office of Peter on the heresy of the denial of Hell.

At the other spectrum, lay Catholics and readers of the Catholic World Report appear to be fed up with CWR editor Carl Olson and his boss Mark Brumley's spin of the latest Pope Francis scandal and are, also, rebelling

What brought this explosion about is the article by Brumley written on April 2 which is called "Hell and Pope Francis" for Olson's CWR.

In the piece Brumley whitewashes the Francis scandal of the statement attributed to him by his close friend abortion advocate Eugenio Scalfari where the Pope is quoted as saying the following:

"Hell does not exist."

Francis still apparently refuses to personally and publicly deny this heretical quote attributed to him by his close friend.

Here are some of the commenter's comments. Go to the website to read the rest. All hell breaks loose on Brumley and Olson, as they are fried in the justifiable anger of their readers:

Paul: "[T]he author of this article is willfully deluded. It is a objective fact that Pope Bergoglio refused to deny and condemn the heretical belief of Hell attributed to him."

Max: "I'm not even sure why publications like CWR even exist if they are only going to spin the Pope's heretical words."

Joe M: "I wish Mr. Brumley would be hired by the Vatican."

Arthur McGowan: "[M]ore heresy reported, with more plausible deniability, but no real denial. And that's how Bergoglio moves the ball down the field."

Pray an Our Father now for Pope Francis to personally and publicly deny the heretical words attributed to him or resign.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...