-Updated July 2, 2017-
The media witch-hunt attacks on Cardinal George Pell seems to be making a fair trial more difficult.
It is hoped that a fair trail can prove Pell's guilt or innocence.
In 2002, Pell was accused of "inappropriately" touching two men, 40 years in the past, in a swimming pool. The Cardinal was cleared of the charges. (Catholic League, "Cardinal Pell Deserves Fair Hearing," June 29, 2017)
The 2002 alleged inappropriate behavior charges are similar to media charges made against conservative Bill O'Reilly that appeared lightweight compared to the gravity of the liberal Clinton's alleged sexual crimes which the mainstream media covered-up.
The media similarly is covering-up Pope Francis's sex-abuse cover-up scandal while it applied its witch-hunt attacks on Bishop Robert Finn.
The so-called cover-up of conservative Bishop Finn appears lightweight compared to the gravity of the liberal Pope Francis's scandalous act of placing youths at risk to a known sexual predator.
Sex abuse experts psychologist Gerard van den Aardweg and Rick Fitzgerald M.D. reported:
"Pope Francis' restoring to priestly ministry an Italian priest Fr. Mauro Inzoli, who was laicized by Pope Benedict XVI for homosexually abusing adolescent males. After his priestly facilities were restored, he again repeated his homosexual abuse of youth, was arrested and imprisoned."
In the United States, a member of the hierarchy who deliberately places youth at risk of abuse by a known sexual predator is expected to resign." (Lifesitenews, March 6,2017)
The website Veneremurcernui reviewed the Finn case:
"Bishop Finn followed legal protocol and advice in his treatment of defrocked Fr. Shawn Ratigan, and removed him from service after he was found to have taken upskirt photos of underage girls. But Fr. Ratigan repeated his (comparatively minor) crime and the KC media...mounted a relentless campaign of destruction." (veneremurcerni.word.com, April 27, 2017)
Freedom Outpost reported:
Juanita "Broaddrick claims that Bill Clinton raped her twice in a hotel room in 1978 and that Hillary Clinton was involved in covering it up." (FreedomOutPost.com, April 25, 2017)
The left wing Daily Beast reviewed the boorish sexual-harassment claims against O'Reilly:
-"O'Reilly tried to kiss her."
- Accused "O'Reilly of proportioning her."
--"O'Reilly called her "hot chocolate" (she was black) and would grunted and leer at her"
- "O'Reilly had made unwanted advances at her."
-"O'Reilly would masturbate while on the phone with Mackris." (TheDailyBeast.com, April 19,2017)
The allegations against O'Reilly if true are boorish and very wrong, but they are not the serious crimes of two times raping a woman which entails prison time.
To be fair to Pell, Clinton and O'Reilly in the United States and Australia you are not guilty until proven so in a court of law.
The case against Bishop Finn is plainly unjust. There is no reason he should have been forced to resign.
Pope Francis if he was a United States bishop would have been "expected to resign."
If Finn was forced to resign then it is only fair that Francis should be forced to resign.
A Vatican expert who wishes to remain anonymous told the Catholic Monitor:
"Pope Francis's behavior on protecting children is scandalous, yet the media gives him a pass. He refused to pull his friendly prelates who protect predators out of ministry. He undoes the laicization of predators."
The media witch-hunt attacks on Cardinal George Pell seems to be making a fair trial more difficult.
It is hoped that a fair trail can prove Pell's guilt or innocence.
In 2002, Pell was accused of "inappropriately" touching two men, 40 years in the past, in a swimming pool. The Cardinal was cleared of the charges. (Catholic League, "Cardinal Pell Deserves Fair Hearing," June 29, 2017)
The 2002 alleged inappropriate behavior charges are similar to media charges made against conservative Bill O'Reilly that appeared lightweight compared to the gravity of the liberal Clinton's alleged sexual crimes which the mainstream media covered-up.
The media similarly is covering-up Pope Francis's sex-abuse cover-up scandal while it applied its witch-hunt attacks on Bishop Robert Finn.
The so-called cover-up of conservative Bishop Finn appears lightweight compared to the gravity of the liberal Pope Francis's scandalous act of placing youths at risk to a known sexual predator.
Sex abuse experts psychologist Gerard van den Aardweg and Rick Fitzgerald M.D. reported:
"Pope Francis' restoring to priestly ministry an Italian priest Fr. Mauro Inzoli, who was laicized by Pope Benedict XVI for homosexually abusing adolescent males. After his priestly facilities were restored, he again repeated his homosexual abuse of youth, was arrested and imprisoned."
In the United States, a member of the hierarchy who deliberately places youth at risk of abuse by a known sexual predator is expected to resign." (Lifesitenews, March 6,2017)
The website Veneremurcernui reviewed the Finn case:
"Bishop Finn followed legal protocol and advice in his treatment of defrocked Fr. Shawn Ratigan, and removed him from service after he was found to have taken upskirt photos of underage girls. But Fr. Ratigan repeated his (comparatively minor) crime and the KC media...mounted a relentless campaign of destruction." (veneremurcerni.word.com, April 27, 2017)
Freedom Outpost reported:
Juanita "Broaddrick claims that Bill Clinton raped her twice in a hotel room in 1978 and that Hillary Clinton was involved in covering it up." (FreedomOutPost.com, April 25, 2017)
The left wing Daily Beast reviewed the boorish sexual-harassment claims against O'Reilly:
-"O'Reilly tried to kiss her."
- Accused "O'Reilly of proportioning her."
--"O'Reilly called her "hot chocolate" (she was black) and would grunted and leer at her"
- "O'Reilly had made unwanted advances at her."
-"O'Reilly would masturbate while on the phone with Mackris." (TheDailyBeast.com, April 19,2017)
The allegations against O'Reilly if true are boorish and very wrong, but they are not the serious crimes of two times raping a woman which entails prison time.
To be fair to Pell, Clinton and O'Reilly in the United States and Australia you are not guilty until proven so in a court of law.
The case against Bishop Finn is plainly unjust. There is no reason he should have been forced to resign.
Pope Francis if he was a United States bishop would have been "expected to resign."
If Finn was forced to resign then it is only fair that Francis should be forced to resign.
A Vatican expert who wishes to remain anonymous told the Catholic Monitor:
"Pope Francis's behavior on protecting children is scandalous, yet the media gives him a pass. He refused to pull his friendly prelates who protect predators out of ministry. He undoes the laicization of predators."
Comments