Skip to main content

Democrats for Life is Laughingstock Thanks to Pro-Abort Stupak's Deal

Democrats for Life Sole Pro-Life Group Defending Pro-Abortion Bill, Stupak

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor

March 22, 2010



Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Just one pro-life organization has issued a statement applauding the pro-abortion health care bill the House approved Sunday night and the executive order deal Congressman Bart Stupak stuck with President Barack Obama to get enough votes to secure its passage.

Democrats for Life of America is the national organization for pro-life Democrats who were once respected by have become the laughingstock of the pro-life movement thanks to Stupak's deal.

The organization's executive director, Kristen Day, sent LifeNews.com a statement praising the deal, Stupak and Obama.

"We applaud President Obama for his bold leadership in agreeing to an executive order that bans taxpayer-funded abortions in the health care reform bill that passed the House,' Day said. "We are proud to support this historic health care legislation."

"President Obama's Executive Order shows that when we work towards common ground in Washington, we can do the people's business and end the gridlock. By working with House leaders and the White House, DFLA shows how pro-life Democrats are a key and growing constituency," Day added.

Her comments stand in stark contrast to dozens of pro-life groups that have panned the executive order as a sham. Even Planned Parenthood called the order meaningless.

Day omits any mention of the portions of its legislative initiative that made its way into the Senate bill as a reason for supporting it.

Democrats for Life had been championing the Pregnant Women Support Act it called the 95-10 Initiative that merged some pro-life measures with provisions to provide support for pregnant women.

On the Senate side, when Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska decided to vote for the pro-abortion health care bill, he included some of the social provisions of the Act not limiting abortions into his pro-abortion compromise. They included adoption promotion and welfare provisions for pregnant women.

Still, the addition of the provisions wasn't enough for 34 Democrats to support the legislation as some pro-life Democrats abandoned Stupak and DFLA by voting against the health care bill over its massive abortion funding and promotion. Even Lincoln Davis, the Tennessee congressman who sponsored the Pregnant Women Support Act for DFLA in the House, voted against the health care bill over its abortion funding.

That Nelson was the lawmaker who made it possible for passage of the pro-abortion bill in the Senate and Stupak the House member who secured passage in the lower chamber is not lost on pro-life advocates.

Phyllis Schlafly, president and founder of the conservative grassroots public policy organization Eagle Forum, said Stupak's "sellout" revealed the "myth of the pro-life Democrat."

"Stupak and his Democrat followers have now clarified that you cannot be pro-life and be a Democrat. If abortion was truly their biggest issue, they wouldn't willfully align themselves with the Party of Death," she said.

"This vote will expose the myth of the 'pro-life Democrat.' With this single vote, the Democratic Party will divide our nation into the Party of Death and the Party of Life, and future elections will never be the same," she concluded.

Comments

Unknown said…
Shouldn't you Catholics be more concerned about the pedaphiles you pass off as Priest rather than dictating to women what they should do with their bodies?

Popular posts from this blog

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...

non veni pacem (Mark Docherty) Prevost appoints Cupich to join McCarrick roomie Farrell at the Pontifical Commission for the Vatican City State

non veni pacem (Mark Docherty) Prevost appoints Cupich to join McCarrick roomie Farrell at the Pontifical Commission for the Vatican City State Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia and  for the restoration of the Church. Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost – Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet. Conclave Notes: Has the Trad Media fallen into a COVID-like mass formation with Leo XVI? While it's humorous to see the former anti-Francis Trad pundits suddenly acting like teen age girls infatuated with Leo, it could lead to a Trojan Horse ...

LifeSite: "Prevost’s reported support...allowing divorced & civilly 'remarried'...to receive Holy Communion": “Whoever…helps...promulgation of heresy…is suspected of heresy.” --Canon 2316, Code of Canon Law (1917-1982)

“Whoever…willingly and knowingly helps in the promulgation of heresy…is suspected of heresy.” --Canon 2316,  Code of Canon Law (1917-1982) Trump congratulates Pope Leo XIV on being named first American pontiff ... .. .  While Prevost’s election to the papacy is sure to gladden a number of Americans, and  the cardinal has been  seen  as a “compromise candidate” for the papacy by the College of Cardinals, his history indicates that he may continue the heterodox positions of Pope Francis.  This includes, significantly, Prevost’s  reported  support of the practice of  allowing divorced and civilly “remarried” Catholics to receive Holy Communion without repentance. [ https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trump-congratulates-pope-leo-xiv-on-being-named-first-american-pontiff/?utm_source=featured-news&utm_campaign=catholic] Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis’s Amoris Laetitia. Pray an Our Father now for ...