Skip to main content

Democrats for Life is Laughingstock Thanks to Pro-Abort Stupak's Deal

Democrats for Life Sole Pro-Life Group Defending Pro-Abortion Bill, Stupak

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor

March 22, 2010



Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Just one pro-life organization has issued a statement applauding the pro-abortion health care bill the House approved Sunday night and the executive order deal Congressman Bart Stupak stuck with President Barack Obama to get enough votes to secure its passage.

Democrats for Life of America is the national organization for pro-life Democrats who were once respected by have become the laughingstock of the pro-life movement thanks to Stupak's deal.

The organization's executive director, Kristen Day, sent LifeNews.com a statement praising the deal, Stupak and Obama.

"We applaud President Obama for his bold leadership in agreeing to an executive order that bans taxpayer-funded abortions in the health care reform bill that passed the House,' Day said. "We are proud to support this historic health care legislation."

"President Obama's Executive Order shows that when we work towards common ground in Washington, we can do the people's business and end the gridlock. By working with House leaders and the White House, DFLA shows how pro-life Democrats are a key and growing constituency," Day added.

Her comments stand in stark contrast to dozens of pro-life groups that have panned the executive order as a sham. Even Planned Parenthood called the order meaningless.

Day omits any mention of the portions of its legislative initiative that made its way into the Senate bill as a reason for supporting it.

Democrats for Life had been championing the Pregnant Women Support Act it called the 95-10 Initiative that merged some pro-life measures with provisions to provide support for pregnant women.

On the Senate side, when Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska decided to vote for the pro-abortion health care bill, he included some of the social provisions of the Act not limiting abortions into his pro-abortion compromise. They included adoption promotion and welfare provisions for pregnant women.

Still, the addition of the provisions wasn't enough for 34 Democrats to support the legislation as some pro-life Democrats abandoned Stupak and DFLA by voting against the health care bill over its massive abortion funding and promotion. Even Lincoln Davis, the Tennessee congressman who sponsored the Pregnant Women Support Act for DFLA in the House, voted against the health care bill over its abortion funding.

That Nelson was the lawmaker who made it possible for passage of the pro-abortion bill in the Senate and Stupak the House member who secured passage in the lower chamber is not lost on pro-life advocates.

Phyllis Schlafly, president and founder of the conservative grassroots public policy organization Eagle Forum, said Stupak's "sellout" revealed the "myth of the pro-life Democrat."

"Stupak and his Democrat followers have now clarified that you cannot be pro-life and be a Democrat. If abortion was truly their biggest issue, they wouldn't willfully align themselves with the Party of Death," she said.

"This vote will expose the myth of the 'pro-life Democrat.' With this single vote, the Democratic Party will divide our nation into the Party of Death and the Party of Life, and future elections will never be the same," she concluded.

Comments

Anonymous said…
We could learn a lot from crayons. Some are sharp, some are pretty and some are dull, Some have weird names , and all are different colors, but they all have to live in the same box.............................................
Unknown said…
Shouldn't you Catholics be more concerned about the pedaphiles you pass off as Priest rather than dictating to women what they should do with their bodies?

Popular posts from this blog

Bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx "Exemption" Letter & Stated: "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary"

Today, the bishops of Colorado gave an apparent Vaxx " exemption" letter (21_8_Vaccine_Exemption_CCC_Fin...docx(20KB)) and stated that "Vaccination is Not Morally Obligatory and so Must Be Voluntary":  COLORADO CATHOLIC CONFERENCE 1535 Logan Street | Denver, CO 80203-1913 303-894-8808 | cocatholicconference.org   [Date]   To Whom It May Concern, [Name] is a baptized Catholic seeking a religious exemption from an immunization requirement. This letter explains how the Catholic Church’s teachings may lead individual Catholics, including [name], to decline certain vaccines. The Catholic Church teaches that a person may be required to refuse a medical intervention, including a vaccination, if his or her conscience comes to this judgment. While the Catholic Church does not prohibit the use of most vaccines, and generally encourages them to safeguard personal and public health, the following authoritative Church teachings demonstrate the principled religious

Does Francis's "Right-hand Man" Parra have a "Sexual Predation against Seminarians, Adultery, and even a Deadly Sex Game...[that] 'might even be a Scandal Surpassing that of McCarrick'"?

  Archbishop Edgar Peña Parra with Francis Today, the Call Me Jorge website asked "What could be so important that Francis interrupted his weekly adulation [Audience] session?": Pope gets a phone call during the Audience. Haven’t seen this before. Then he quickly leaves and says he will be back. pic.twitter.com/npCuPzdnxP — The Catholic Traveler (@MountainButorac) August 11, 2021 It was Abp. Mons. Edgar Robinson Peña Parra, Substitute for the Secretariat of State, who was involved in the recent scandal of mismanagement during the acquisition of a € 300 million building in London. Still no word on what the phone call was about . [http://callmejorgebergoglio.blogspot.com/2021/08/what-could-be-so-important-that-francis.html] Who is Archbishop Edgar Robinson Peña Parra ? Parra according to the Catholic Herald is Francis's "right-hand man"[https://catholicherald.co.uk/roman-curia-the-popes-new-right-hand-man/] In 2019, Life Site News reported that Parra alleged

Might it be Good for all of us & for Francis to Read about the "Gruesome Death of Arius"?

  I have read the letters of your piety , in which you have requested me to make known to you the events of my times relating to myself, and to give an account of that most impious heresy of the Arians , in consequence of which I have endured these sufferings, and also of the manner of the death of Arius . With two out of your three demands I have readily undertaken to comply, and have sent to your Godliness what I wrote to the Monks; from which you will be able to learn my own history as well as that of the heresy . But with respect to the other matter, I mean the death, I debated with myself for a long time, fearing lest any one should suppose that I was exulting in the death of that man. But yet, since a disputation which has taken place among you concerning the heresy , has issued in this question, whether Arius died after previously communicating with the Church ; I therefore was necessarily desirous of giving an account of his death, as thinking that the question woul