Skip to main content

New book from Dr. Mazza! BUY HERE Saints vs Antipopes reveals crucial truths for Catholics in the face of the Francis/Leo reigns of t/error

SAINTS vs ANTIPOPES: Blockbuster new book from Dr. Mazza!

BUY HERE

Saints vs Antipopes reveals crucial truths for Catholics in the face of the Francis/Leo reigns of t/error:

The actions of saints like St. Bernard and St. Norbert who publicly denounced, plotted to overthrow—and even dispatched armies against—a canonically elected “pope,” who ruled from Rome for almost eight years…unprecedented “sedition” against a sitting “pontiff.”

The teaching of saints like Robert Bellarmine and other reputed theologians on how Christ’s prayer protects the Church and Popes from ever teaching heresy: “the Pope not only should not, but cannot preach heresy, but rather should always preach the truth. He will certainly do that, since the Lord commanded him to confirm his brethren, and for that reason added: ‘I have prayed for thee, that thy faith shall not fail,’ (Lk 22:32)”

The shocking secrets that Mary, Queen of All Saints, revealed to saints and holy people at LaSalette, Fatima, and Akita: “The Church will be eclipsed/one will not know which is the true pope.” “An apostasy will begin at the top of the Church.” “There will be a man who is in the Vatican, dressed in white, looking something like a pope but talking like the devil. He is supposedly the head of Christianity, but is, in fact, spewing the doctrine of an antipope.”

DR. EDMUND J. MAZZA teaches live, online and recorded video courses on Catholic History, Marian Apparitions, Saints Lives, as well as the latest controversies at www.edmundmazza.com. Mazza is former full professor at Azusa Pacific University where he taught for 14 years. He has guest appeared multiple times on Dr. Taylor Marshall, Tim Gordon’s Rules for Retrogrades, The John-Henry Westen Show, and Ann Barnhardt podcasts.

https://www.amazon.com/Saints-Antipopes-Church-Convicted-Evicted-ebook/dp/B0GP6MSSKV/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...