Skip to main content

@Somethi65907719..hilarious..they’re [Sammon & collaborators] stupidly trashing Vigano rather than facing reality..@Grotto_NH..Laypeople questioning the credentials of an archbishop who has outed evil in the Church on multiple occasions Hilarious


Yeah, it’s kind of hilarious but really just sad. Lots of them are, in my opinion, doing so because they can’t face the reality that they need to find another line of work. I feel badly for them, but they’re stupidly trashing Vigano rather than facing reality.
Quote
Old Dad
@Grotto_NH
Laypeople questioning the credentials of an archbishop who has outed evil in the Church on multiple occasions Hilarious

Comments

Renato said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
Renato said…
We are in eschatological times whose understanding is needed in order to remain in the faith. Thus we will hear, out of this agitation of accusations, what "the Spirit saith unto the Churches" (Revelation 3:13), that we may not be "vomited."

Benedict XVI abdicated the ministry instead of the Munus Petrino, a requirement of the Universi Dominici Gregis for the legitimacy of the act according to canonical norm 32.2. Thus Ratzinger died remaining as legitimate Pope.

And that for a good understanding half a word is enough.

Divine providence has anticipated this to make clear in modern times in order to avoid this confusion of today.

St. Francis of Assisi prophesied a non-canonically elected pope would be the cause of great trials. And he says that the fault, in this canonical context presented by him, is that many prefer to consent, rather than fight this canonical error. Thus there would be diversity of opinions and schisms among Catholics. And he revealed that in those times if they were not abbreviated even the elect would be misled. His reasoning would demonstrate the lack of charity to the Church and its norms, which are related to the authority of a legitimate Vicar of Christ, that all this chaos would occur.

Knowing this, the saint of Assisi always obliged his friars to obey the Roman Pontiff, but a canonically legitimate Pope.

Because he knew that the Catholic Church is united to the legitimate Pope, and a legitimate Pope united to the Catholic Church.

It is up to everyone to discern in order to understand what is likely to happen soon.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...