Skip to main content

Hero of the Week Vigano: @rtf_media Catherine Austin Fitts, of @solari_the , weighs in — calling His Excellency, @CarloMVigano , a Hero.


Catherine Austin Fitts, of , weighs in — calling His Excellency, , a Hero. Fitts accurately described the massive wealth fraud in the 2020 riots, and has been on the leading edge against CBDC’s. home.solari.com/hero-of-the-we
Image

Comments

Renato said…
This archbishop should never be considered a hero, much less among Catholics who seek a safe path, without ideologies or false mysticism, but only in Christ's trust in the Church.

The fact says that Bishop Williamson conditionally reconsecrated Archbishop Viganò, a committed cooperation between them, as well as being a deeper cooperation and under the leadership of Dugin, whose goal is the "Third Rome".

This act alone shows that there is a denial, subjection to the legitimately elected Roman Pontiffs or the communion of members subject to them.

But the reason goes deeper that led Williamson and Viganò to reject everything at the last Church Council.

There is another belief in the schism between the Easterners and the Westers, which is believed to have apostatized Rome and was no longer the center of Christianity, so it was moved to Constantinople. But this Rome lost power to the Turks in 1453 and was later transferred to Moscow. And when this Rome was definitively established in Moscow, this belief was born as the "Third Rome", whose empire became a Katechon in eschatological times against the Antichrist.

This heresy belongs to Philotheus of Pskov in a letter written to Tsar Basil III in 1510. The latter, the Eastern monk believed to be the sole emperor of the Christians. He mentioned to the emperor that the two Romes apostatized, but the third will remain in the faith always, i.e., the "Third Rome."

And Aleksandr Dugin appears in this East as the great spiritual mentor of this new Rome that aims to destroy Catholicism from within today, which certainly supports this decadent anti-papal movement compromised between Williamson and Viganò. A traditionalism that does not come from God and that defends a dualism between a Catholicism and an occultism, at the same time among its participants. Dugin cites an example of the philosophical so-called Thelema by Alistair Crowley, who believed in love over the law. This logically flouts any legitimate ecclesiastical norm in Catholicism.

That is why two prelates do not believe that Catholicism is a guarantee against the New World Order, because it is in a stage of transition to that same order.

This is the cause of Archbishop Vigano seeking an unconditional reconsecration of the episcopal and other sacraments with Bishop Williamson.

And that is the reason why the archbishop did not want to go to this "apostate Rome" to defend himself against the accusation of schism.

It doesn't matter to him whether today Bergoglio is a legitimate pope or not, just as he didn't care that he received the episcopate from a legitimate Vicar of Christ who was John Paul II.

Father Chazal says, in a lecture believed to be about a reconsecration of the archbishop, that he had a "sudden" conversion and left this "conciliar sect" that he was part of later, although the cause was a scandalous cardinal very similar in Crowley's mindset.

And Father Chazal repeats Dugin's myth about Carthage (in the video link below, 4:18) about its destruction, whose empire was great and power had no limit; but Rome set a limit to that empire. This new Rome will destroy apostate Rome, for the Russian Rome is now the real Rome.

Today Dugin is the main mastermind in this myth of the "Third Rome", which is inside the two prelates, Patriarch Kirilll, a former KGB agent, and none other than President Putin himself, also a former KGB, all committed to this eschatological role of the Russian Empire.

---

https://www.memri.org/reports/russian-anti-liberal-philosopher-dugin-third-rome-moscow-putting-limit-new-carthage-west

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDIblj4UQVc&t=268s

https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/is-archbishop-vigano-looking-east

https://www.gnosticwarrior.com/aleksandr-dugin-the-gnostic.html

https://www.marcotosatti.com/2023/04/24/monsenor-vigano-sobre-rusia-comentario-de-monsenor-richard-williamson/

https://ecclesia.com.br/biblioteca/igreja_ortodoxa/a_igreja_ortodoxa_historia15.html

Renato said…
Bishop Wilianson also had a "sudden conversion." He was from an Anglican family. Wilianson was very close to a British Intelligence and KGB double agent who influenced him to enter the seminary of the Society of St. Pius X.

https://web.archive.org/web/20231219014834/https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Williamson_%28bishop%29&diff=prev&oldid=221253995#Early_life_and_ministry

Renato said…
All Catholics should believe in a hermeneutic in continuity, as Pope Benedict XVI advocated about before and after the last Council, in order not to fall into deception. All the popes after the Council were legitimate, but even Ratzinger. The Universi Dominici Gregis proved by Benedict XVi continued with the Munus, according to the norm required of the office, until his death. And that should be enough. Divine providence will continue in this selective purification in the Church until a legitimate future conclave takes place.
Fred Martinez said…
Might you be Opus Dei and/or anti-Traditionalist in line with the likes of Francis pundit Michael Lofton who believes that Vatican II is a super dogma that destroys all previous infallible dogma like no Communion for adulterers, etc...?
Fred Martinez said…

Kennedy Hall
@kennedyhall
FYI the Hermeneutic of Continuity is not a dogma… it is a theological opinion about how to interpret Vatican II, but it is not a dogmatic interpretation of the Council itself.
5:36 AM · Jul 2, 2024
·
3,275
Views
Anonymous said…
No pope can promote formal heresy, so if Benedict was the pope and he promoted Vatican II, it taught no heresy. If the the post conciliar popes before Bergoglio were nopes, then explain how dogma was not contradicted, given that lawful apostolic succession is a mark of the Church and intimately connected to indefectibility? If they were nopes none of their bishops were lawfully appointed and all the bishops appointed before John XIII are dead.

At this point a deep trad will say that there are apostolic successors because their bishops are validly consecrated, but indefectibility claims there will be LAWFUL successors till the end of time. What year did time end? I missed the memo.
Renato said…
Fred, the Council is only pastoral, there is nothing dogmatic about it. But one must not break into a hermeneutical continuity(not so long ago an anonymous commentator demonstrated this here. For the Church has not really defected). The Council is a historical fact and is embedded in the magisterium. The Church grows in a logic that two plus two equals four in the teachings according to events in the world. The problem is the ambiguities in the texts, but you can't claim that the texts are heretical. So a future pope must make it clearer one day. But I try to focus on that through the archbishop's mistake or whatever. We must follow only the truth.

Popular posts from this blog

"I love Cardinal Burke, but I've run out of patience": A Vatican expert who has met Francis & wishes to remain anonymous gave The Catholic Monitor an impassioned statement for Cardinal Burke & the faithful bishops: End the Bergoglio Borgata

Catholic Conclave @cathconclave @Pontifex thanks journalists for practicing omertà. The mind boggles at the scale of the possible coverups that this has enabled. How does he think a use victims feel when hearing this statement Quote Damian Thompson @holysmoke · Jan 22 Incredible! Pope Francis lets the cat out of the bag, thanking Vatican correspondents for their "silence" and therefore helping him conceal the scandals of his pontificate. Take a bow, guys! 8:23 AM · Jan 22, 2024 · 345 Views The moral crisis and "doctrinal anarchy" as Vatican expert Edward Pentin and others have written about in the Church caused by Francis has reached the breaking point where all faithful Catholics must pray for and demand that Cardinal Raymond Burke and the faithful bishops issue the correction and investigate if Francis is a n invalidly elected anti-pope . That is the purpose of this post. A Vatican expert who has met Francis and wishes to remain anonymous gave The Catholic Monit

Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: "212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted...Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden"

  William Binney Binney at the Congress on Privacy & Surveillance (2013) of the École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Born William Edward Binney September 1943 (age 77) Pennsylvania , U.S. Education Pennsylvania State University (B.S., 1970) Occupation Cryptanalyst-mathematician Employer National Security Agency (NSA) Known for Cryptography , SIGINT analysis, whistleblowing Awards Meritorious Civilian Service Award Joe A. Callaway Award for Civic Courage (2012) [1] Sam Adams Award (2015) [2] Signature [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Binney_(intelligence_official) ] Former intelligence official with the National Security Agency (NSA) and whistleblower , William Edward Binney, whose occupation is cryptanalyst-mathematician explained that Joe Biden's "win" was impossible because "Biden Claims 13 MILLION More Votes Than There Were Eligible Voters Who Voted in 2020 Election" according to Gateway Pundit. Binney revealed "With 212Mil

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

    Deliverance Prayers II  The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of lightning, in