Skip to main content

Bishop Strickland: Pope Francis’ record on sex abuse gives ‘artillery’ to enemies of the Church.."He supposes that if one knows the 'right people' or is in the 'right position,' Francis’ 'zero tolerance' policy on abuse does not apply"

Bishop Strickland: Pope Francis’ record on sex abuse gives ‘artillery’ to enemies of the Church

Comments

Justina said…
Bishop Strickland, channeling Inspector Clouseau, wants "whoever was responsible" for the recent drag show and, implicitly, for the McCarrick situation and countless related atrocities, to be held accountable, does he now?

And here's the real kicker--he wants them held accountable by Pope Francis himself!

And he expects us to believe that that is what he wants, when he--Bishop Strickland himself--expressly points out that the authority figure in question "needs no process or discussion to act." In the institutional Church today, in other words, the buck stops with the Argentinian-in-white, so what is the point of pretending to wonder what is really going on?

If A equals B and B equals C, then A equals C. If whoever is responsible for all this must be removed by Pope Francis and if Pope Francis rules the institutional Church by personal fiat (and I don't mean Our Blessed Mother's), then Bergoglio must remove himself.
Bergoglio must resign.

But even our most faithful and outspoken leaders go on refusing--even at the cost of turning themselves into one of the clowns Pope Francis seems to love so much--to come out and say so. We always hear that a fear of being cancelled is keeping them quiet, but this can hardly be the case with Bishop Strickland, having been precipitously and unfairly removed from his Diocese already. Something irrational, and diabolically so,is making puppets of us all.

(Here is a pertinent portion of the coverage at Lifesite News:

"Strickland offers reaction to the drag performer present at the Vatican-hosted World Children’s Day later in the first part.

Strickland calls on Pope Francis to address the performance, and that whoever was responsible for the drag performance must be removed. If, the bishop says, he can be removed for teaching the truth, then whoever organized the performance can themselves be removed. Francis has made it “clear” he needs no process or discussion to act.

“Pope Francis, you need to act in this case,” Strickland says forcefully. “You need to remove anyone and everyone who allowed this to happen because it is evil. Evil is dancing in the Vatican, and we cannot sit on our hands and quietly say, ‘Oh that’s too bad,’ or ‘Oh that’s not very nice.’ It is evil! And it needs to be called out.”)

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...