Skip to main content

[Liberal Jew] Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald Everyone knows that criticizing Israel or even being associated with anyone who does is the brightest of red lines, the easiest way to suffer career..reputational damage in the US. I really wish people who support this would just defend it instead of pretending it's not true.


Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald
Everyone knows that criticizing Israel or even being associated with anyone who does is the brightest of red lines, the easiest way to suffer career and reputational damage in the US. I really wish people who support this would just defend it instead of pretending it's not true.
666
Views

Comments

Renato said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
9:51 AM
Renato said…
The Jewish mentors were those who created the state of Israel and who dominate the world. And today the same Jews persecute all critics who comment primarily on the Jewish historical context, according to an official version created by the Jews.

But you can't demonize them just for that; the Church says that they alone cannot be held responsible for the death of Christ, for example. And this is written in the Catholic Catechism, numbers 597 and 598. This catechism exemplifies a passage from St. Francis of Assisi: "The demons did not crucify; you are the one who crucified and continue to crucify him with them, delighting in vices and sin."

One cannot blame the Jewish people exclusively for all evil, for evil is not only among the Jewish people. And this refers primarily to sin.

This coherence is found in Our Lady's message at Fatima, for example, which speaks only of the need for the conversion of humanity. And there is no name of a specific group in the message, but of a country called Russia. Although Russian leader Putin is committed to the Jewish sect Chabad Lubavitch, Jews are not mentioned.

For reason says that it is the greater responsibility of those who know Our Lord in order to remain faithful to Him.

The Catholic must soften the fate that awaits him in these eschatological times.
10:44 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more