Skip to main content

@FeserEdward..what happens when endless talk about [Francis] mercy is never balanced by talk of justice and repentance..Damian Thompson @holysmoke..Francis’s tolerance for abuse cover-ups and willingness to see victims smeared...

Post

Conversation

Edward Feser
@FeserEdward
This is what happens when endless talk about mercy is never balanced by talk of justice and repentance, and when sexual sins are treated as if they were per se of minor significance.
Quote
Damian Thompson
@holysmoke
Yet more grave questions about Pope Francis’s tolerance for abuse cover-ups and willingness to see victims smeared: apnews.com/article/italy-
Image
1,291
Views

Comments

Renato said…
The Church is the living sign of the salvation of humanity, thanks to God the Father who sent his Only-begotten Son to save us, that is, this is divine mercy. And I read recently that John Paul II once commented on the assassination attempt on him on May 13, 1981.

He said that the attack directed was not only directed at him, but at the entire Mystical Body of Christ on earth. Because St. Augustine says that the Pope is the figura ecclesia and represents the Church as a whole.

Bergoglio doesn't fit in one thing or the other. He represents everything opposite: a dead Church that will persecute the faithful who are still alive in order to lead them also to perdition. Because he is a pseudo-prophet (Revelation 19:20) and a pseudo-religious leader of a pseudo-Church that will sway apostasy to the top. He deceives many and betrays the peoples of the earth (Revelation 13:14), and hopes to lead mankind to worship the Antichrist (Revelation 13:12), of which he is a forerunner.

For these and other reasons, Bergoglio was never Pope yesterday, today and never will be tomorrow.
1:06 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more