Skip to main content

BREAKING: It's Official: The Vatican Admits That Deaconesses Are Happening Return To Tradition

BREAKING: It's Official: The Vatican Admits That Deaconesses ...

www.youtube.com › watch
BREAKING: It's Official: The Vatican Admits That Deaconesses Are

Comments

Renato said…
The progress of the wicked will grow even more and there is no way to revert to wickedness in the end-time world but to soften it through prayers. And there is an intention of theirs to visibly destroy the Mystical Body of Christ on earth in this context as well. The Catholic must do his part and go out in the Mystical Body of the Antichrist, for there is no Church without the Munus petrinum. It was not a substantial mistake on the part of Pope Benedict XVI to keep it to himself, but a divine providence for there to be no complicity in this apostasy. The Apostolic Constitution Universe Dominici Gregis is to be proclaimed from On top of the rooftops (Matthew 10:27).
2:08 AM
Renato said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
5:39 AM
Renato said…
There is no way to do any good while being a part of iniquity (John 15:5). Nothing can be done where there is no divine grace.

Bergoglio was never pope because he was a foreign body within the Church whose divine providence definitively separated him from it. An example to understand this is Tyconius, whom Benedict XVI liked to remind him of:

"Augustine read this comment [by Tyconius] and took advantage of it, but he strongly stressed that the Church is in the hands of Christ, remains his Body, forming with Him a single subject, participating in the mediation of grace. Therefore, it underlines that the Church can never be separated from Jesus Christ."

Therefore, the Church is in this situation in the desert today. And this is where the Universo Dominici Gregis comes in, articles 76 and 77, with the non-abdication of the Munus petrinum by Ratzinger; Catholics are entrusted to the same providence, the continuity of which in the succession of St. Peter in the Church will remain.

Of course, choices will always have consequences, as every decision will have consequences for good or bad. But it is a call to embrace the cross spontaneously in order to actively participate in the same divine providence in the Church of Christ. Therefore, it is a purpose for good.
5:41 AM
Anonymous said…
As long as Jesus is still present in Eucharist--as long as they have not amended the words of consecration--there is still grace. Not till the curtain in the temple rent did it mean the Old Testament priesthood was over as ministers of God.
8:26 AM
Renato said…
The Encyclical Letter Ecclesia de Eucharistia says no, because there is a coherence in it with the Apostolic Constitution cited above. That is why it is necessary for us to go deeper in order to know the truth.
10:21 AM
Renato said…
Only in the case of the Ecclesia supplet, that is, the Church that supplies this spiritual need. But it would not be to the merit of this Church because it is apostate. Soon we will follow this reasoning for further clarification.
12:24 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more