Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...


Comments
And the birth crisis is increasingly worrisome among the natives of the country: before, for every nine young people at work, they helped with the retirement of an old man; Today, out of every four young people at work, they help an old man retire. The state will not be able to pay thousands of retirees, let alone a few young people who work in exchange for machines, according to the Fourth Industrial Revolution proposed by Davos.
Because there is no universal basic income that can suppress all of that. And an AI system with drones and facial recognition can turn against the system's masterminds. In addition, there are several fronts today of war with countries with nuclear bombs that all of humanity will not be able to endure all of this, except by divine interference.
It is the four horsemen of the Apocalypse who are approaching.