Skip to main content

Francis Effect: John Zmirak The Pornocracy at the Vatican


John Zmirak

The Pornocracy at the Vatican

Comments

Anonymous said…
I often read posts similar to this one that the author warns his reader about content that may lead him to despair.

There is indeed a misleading image of the Church of Christ today and the wicked acts of Bergoglio that for many generate a reason for revolt and scandal, but it is the only way for the purification of many members of the Church, in addition to the survival of the Church itself.

I think that God shows over time in the constant evidences that the way is unique, although many do not understand it because they do not go deeper into it.

It is good to repeat always: Catholic doctrine teaches that being will be the same being; the Church will always be the same because there is no other Church; and Christ is the same, yesterday, today, and forever (Hebrews 3:18); the Gospel will also always be the same. Therefore, the Cross will always be with us on our pilgrimage, there will be no other way than through purification on the same Cross.

[more]
12:27 PM
Anonymous said…
I think that God shows over time in the constant evidences that the way is unique, although many do not understand it because they do not go deeper into it.Thus the last Roman Pontiff of the Church who abdicated the ministry, instead of the Petrine Munus, because he wished to remain still head of the Church, to be a greater example to his subordinates who should also follow him, in purification in the divine will that never changes in total and final adherence to the Cross – he in a Roman See totally prevented from reigning and a prisoner in the Mater Ecclesiae until death. Therefore, a single unity in the same will, one in faith for the same determinate and unique end.

The Apostolic Constitution Universe Dominici Gregis is a unique path prophetically prepared, which the Church will always be the same if the subordinates follow faithfully. The Constitution requires these same members to obey the authority of the Vicar of Christ on earth. It is a commitment to God on the path of our purification, with Bergoglio as a manifestation of the divine will and rescue of the good image of the Church. Because it is obvious that we are now being tested whether or not we will continue in continuity with the divine will in the Church, with the legitimate successors of St. Peter in the future, after the death of Benedict XVI.

I think there is no more time for ramblings, but to look at the contradictions about Bergoglio and the crisis in faith: everyone in search of only one truth which is the Cross. For all things work together for good (Romans 8:28).

God will be watching our correspondence to his will for our own salvation and for the good of the Church itself.
12:29 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more