"Democrat-appointed justices..banning Trump without legal justification..intended to create a narrative..framing Trump falsely as a criminal in the headlines..desperate plea to shape the election in favour of the actual criminals"

Here is Not The News

Dr President Donald J Trump Edition

FRANK WRIGHT

JAN 3

READ IN APP

His Imperial Majesty Dr President Donald J Trump on returning to office (2024, colourised)

In these dark times God continues to supply the best headlines.

What power but His could have resulted in the phrase “Trumped Up Charges” as a byword for current events in the US?

In this second part of the news bonanza, I look at how and why the Regime has resorted to legal theatre to STOP TRUMP.

I examine:

What has happened
Where it happened
What will happen next

…and I explore where this all came from.

In short - this is the rule of lawyers versus the rule of law. Will it STOP TRUMP? No.

A piece of political theatre which will be overturned in the Supreme Court

The United States continues its campaign of suicide by cringe. In a concerted effort to undermine any lingering respect for the rule of law, the supreme court of Colorado has ruled against His Imperial Majesty Dr President Donald J Trump.

The court ruled 4-3 to bar Trump from appearing on any presidential ballot. The reason given is that he is an “insurrectionist”, and by telling people to go home instead of walking into the capitol at the invitation of policemen he is a danger to democracy.

The chief justice ruled against this piece of theatre, who described the attempt to disqualify Trump as groundless. CNN reported Justice Brian D. Boatright as saying,

“In the absence of an insurrection-related conviction, I would hold that a request to disqualify a candidate under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment is not a proper cause of action under Colorado’s election code. Therefore, I would dismiss the claim at issue here”

Why did four of the seven Democrat-appointed justices rule in favour of banning Trump without legal justification?

The move is intended to create a narrative. By framing Trump falsely as a criminal in the headlines, this ruling indicates a desperate plea to shape the election in favour of the actual criminals who are busily destroying American power and prestige.

Comments

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...

"Well, 'either one gives up the scapular or they give up immodesty'. The point is they cannot coexist."

By Mary's Secretary In my book The Practice of the Presence of Mary: To Live and Die with Mary , I dedicated Part II to Our Lady of Mount Carmel and Her scapular (fitting as Her feast is approaching), and I specifically mentioned how the scapular and spaghetti straps DO NOT go together. What I mean by that is I have noticed that those in the Church who DO NOT follow the Catholic dress code typically aren’t the ones wearing the scapular. I went on to say that modesty and the scapular go together and if you ever were immodest in dress, the scapular, being Our Lady’s sacramental that it is, gives one the grace to BECOME modest. I can attest to this in my own life. Only after I was enrolled in the scapular did I begin, little by little, become modest. It’s a process. Kind of like the rosary quote, “one either gives up the sin or they give up the rosary.” Well, “either one gives up the scapular or they give up immodesty”. The point is they cannot coexist. In fact...

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

Deliverance Prayers II The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...

The Catholic Monitor

Search This Blog