5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits
Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...
Comments
In this same context, unity in the Church is based on the person of the Vicar of Christ, who represents that identity which distinguishes, for example, from the Russian Orthodox Church, which is opposed and schismatic.
This initiative with Bergoglio's Fiducia Supplicans, totally against faith and morals, proves yet another detail of the Anti-Church: a clear false and subtle change in the visibility of the Church making it similar to the Russian Church.
It is no coincidence that Gnostic doctrine is present among both the Bergoglians and the Russians.
At Vatican II, with ambiguous texts that did not define any new dogma, collegiality weakened papal sovereignty over bishops. Because the pope is unique among the peers who are the bishops.
But Pope Paul VI, with no alternative, as reported by Dr G. Gamberini who was a bishop of the Gnostic Church, and forced to sacrifice a tradition for the survival of the Church, put two explanatory notes on account of the ambiguity of the text about this same collegiality to satisfy the bishops, but to no avail.
And so he renounces a very simple Papal Tiara that looked like a Russian Sputnik missile, placing it on the Altar of St. Peter.
We can analyze these facts coldly: they are part of the same previous revolution that led the bishops, today there is an episcopal independence against the papal document; but against an author of the document who is not a non-legitimate pope, he does not represent the Church.
The Gnostics are demoralizing and blaming the pope and the papacy, destroying unity with Peter, using a puppet to their evil end.
It is the same cunning that was orchestrated before by the serpent to destroy faith today.
https://www.traca.com.br/livro/1054944/maconaria-igreja-catolica/