Hilarious: Seems Dr. Feser thinks St. Paul flew "off the rail" for rebuking St. Peter & "Does Paul’s rebuke of Peter in the Book of Acts prove that St. Peter could not have been the head of the entire Church? Jimmy Akin sets the record straight"
An important pair of articles. As always, De Mattei is a voice of sobriety, whereas Viganò has flown off the rails. The imperative is: respectful and restrained criticism when necessary, schism never, consequent suffering to whatever extent Christ asks it. https://twitter.com/RorateCaeli/status/1732089937174909412…
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
Jun 26, 2019 — Does Paul's rebuke of Peter in the Book of Acts prove that St. Peter could not have been the head of the entire Church?
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
Comments
Anonymous said…
The canonically elected popes have always had faithful ones advising them, first with the example of St. Paul, and then with cardinals and others who have assisted them in difficult decisions. The Church historically demonstrates that these Catholic saints walked for the good of the Papacy and the Church. But it is interesting to note that both Viganò and De Mattei follow the same opposite path.
What draws the most attention is that Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò justifies that Bergoglio is occupying only the Petrine office materially. The word matter seems to be seen covertly as something evil. All this leads us to believe that the facts demonstrate a dialectic on the part of the two. But turning only now to the archbishop: if the present Church is made up of evil prelates, then the popes are evil too. Logic shows that this is the only way to call them modernists of the same "conciliar sect." It is also the same as saying that God has done harm to the Church today and there is nothing more to be done with it.
But this all turns out to be a historical mistake that the Jews exchanged the Tradition of Moses for the Tradition of the Ancients. That is why Christ condemned the tradition of the Jews (Mark 7:1-9).
Therefore, the archbishop is close to ideological traditionalist radicalism; and the TFP layman is walking in the most moderate ideological traditionalism. Both disregard the canonical evidence of the Universi Dominici Gregis that would show who Bergoglio really is.
My opinion is the left hand and the right hand of the same Mystical Body of the Anti-Christ acting against the Mystical Body of Christ.
Comments
What draws the most attention is that Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò justifies that Bergoglio is occupying only the Petrine office materially. The word matter seems to be seen covertly as something evil. All this leads us to believe that the facts demonstrate a dialectic on the part of the two. But turning only now to the archbishop: if the present Church is made up of evil prelates, then the popes are evil too. Logic shows that this is the only way to call them modernists of the same "conciliar sect." It is also the same as saying that God has done harm to the Church today and there is nothing more to be done with it.
But this all turns out to be a historical mistake that the Jews exchanged the Tradition of Moses for the Tradition of the Ancients. That is why Christ condemned the tradition of the Jews (Mark 7:1-9).
Therefore, the archbishop is close to ideological traditionalist radicalism; and the TFP layman is walking in the most moderate ideological traditionalism. Both disregard the canonical evidence of the Universi Dominici Gregis that would show who Bergoglio really is.
My opinion is the left hand and the right hand of the same Mystical Body of the Anti-Christ acting against the Mystical Body of Christ.