Skip to main content

Hilarious: Seems Dr. Feser thinks St. Paul flew "off the rail" for rebuking St. Peter & "Does Paul’s rebuke of Peter in the Book of Acts prove that St. Peter could not have been the head of the entire Church? Jimmy Akin sets the record straight"

Post

Conversation

An important pair of articles. As always, De Mattei is a voice of sobriety, whereas Viganò has flown off the rails. The imperative is: respectful and restrained criticism when necessary, schism never, consequent suffering to whatever extent Christ asks it. twitter.com/RorateCaeli/st
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more

Jun 26, 2019 — Does Paul's rebuke of Peter in the Book of Acts prove that St. Peter could not have been the head of the entire Church?

Comments

Anonymous said…
The canonically elected popes have always had faithful ones advising them, first with the example of St. Paul, and then with cardinals and others who have assisted them in difficult decisions. The Church historically demonstrates that these Catholic saints walked for the good of the Papacy and the Church. But it is interesting to note that both Viganò and De Mattei follow the same opposite path.

What draws the most attention is that Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò justifies that Bergoglio is occupying only the Petrine office materially. The word matter seems to be seen covertly as something evil. All this leads us to believe that the facts demonstrate a dialectic on the part of the two. But turning only now to the archbishop: if the present Church is made up of evil prelates, then the popes are evil too. Logic shows that this is the only way to call them modernists of the same "conciliar sect." It is also the same as saying that God has done harm to the Church today and there is nothing more to be done with it.

But this all turns out to be a historical mistake that the Jews exchanged the Tradition of Moses for the Tradition of the Ancients. That is why Christ condemned the tradition of the Jews (Mark 7:1-9).

Therefore, the archbishop is close to ideological traditionalist radicalism; and the TFP layman is walking in the most moderate ideological traditionalism. Both disregard the canonical evidence of the Universi Dominici Gregis that would show who Bergoglio really is.

My opinion is the left hand and the right hand of the same Mystical Body of the Anti-Christ acting against the Mystical Body of Christ.

Popular posts from this blog

Fr. Chad Ripperger's Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) & Binding Prayer ("In the Name of Jesus Christ, our Lord and God, and by the power of the Most Holy Catholic Church of Jesus, I render all spirits impotent...")

    Deliverance Prayers II  The Minor Exorcisms and Deliverance Prayers compiled by Fr Chad Ripperger: Breastplate of St. Patrick (Modified) I bind (myself, or N.) today to a strong virtue, an invocation of the Trinity. I believe in a Threeness, with a confession of an Oneness in the Creator of the Universe. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Christ’s birth with his baptism, to the virtue of his crucifixion with his burial, to the virtue of his resurrection with his ascension, to the virtue of his coming to the Judgment of Doom. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of ranks of Cherubim, in obedience of Angels, in service of Archangels, in hope of resurrection for reward, in prayers of Patriarchs, in preaching of Apostles, in faiths of confessors, in innocence of Holy Virgins, in deeds of righteous men. I bind (myself, or N.) today to the virtue of Heaven, in light of Sun, in brightness of Snow, in splendor of Fire, in speed of l...

"Well, 'either one gives up the scapular or they give up immodesty'. The point is they cannot coexist."

By Mary's Secretary In my book  The Practice of the Presence of Mary: To Live and Die with Mary , I dedicated Part II to Our Lady of Mount Carmel and Her scapular (fitting as Her feast is approaching), and I specifically mentioned how the scapular and spaghetti straps DO NOT go together. What I mean by that is I have noticed that those in the Church who DO NOT follow the Catholic dress code typically aren’t the ones wearing the scapular. I went on to say that modesty and the scapular go together and if you ever  were  immodest in dress, the scapular, being Our Lady’s sacramental that it is, gives one the grace to BECOME modest.  I can attest to this in my own life. Only after I was enrolled in the scapular did I begin, little by little, become modest. It’s a process. Kind of like the rosary quote, “one either gives up the sin or they give up the rosary.” Well, “either one gives up the scapular or they give up immodesty”. The point is they cannot coexist. In fact...

5 Dubia Questions for 1P5's Steve Skojec & All faithful Catholics especially Francis is definitely Pope Cardinals, Bishops & pundits

Here are five really short and easy to answer dubia questions which hopefully aren't too complicated for Steve Skojec, publisher of the One Peter Five website, to answer. To make it really easy for the publisher of One Peter Five it has been formatted so that he only has to answer: yes or no. 1. Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales said "The Pope... when he is explicitly a heretic... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostolic See." Was St. Francis de Sales a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 2. "Universal Acceptance" theologian John of St. Thomas said "This man in particular lawfully elected and accepted by the Church is the supreme pontiff." Was John of St. Thomas for saying "the supreme pontiff" must be BOTH "lawfully elected and accepted by the Church" a Sedevacantist or a Benevacantist? Answer: yes or no. 3. Do you think that a "supreme pontiff...