Skip to main content

Francis: “[A] misunderstood sense of the centrality of the liturgy” vs. Padre Pio: "It is Easier for the Earth to Exist without the Sun than Without the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass!"

Contenuto disponibile in Italiano

Pope Francis: “I’m much better, but I get tired if I speak too much”

Comments

Anonymous said…
"At the end of the Sabbath, on the morning of the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to see the tomb" (Matthew 18:1). We can imagine that the first timid rays of the sun appeared, and the Risen Christ thus appeared to the disciples.

In this still unclear one, the angel in the very white and perhaps very bright robe tells the women to tell others and Peter first that He is risen (Mark 16:7). And this Church will thus rise again, like Christ who was not recognized by women after coming out in glory in the tomb.

And this Church, always united to Peter, whose seat is Roman, will be consistent with these facts; all the disciples, therefore, united to this Church recognized the Lord through the breaking of bread. They recognized this sacrament that will warm their hearts, although in the world totally opposite because it is cold and dark. We can conclude that all this will bring many into the same fold of the Lord.

The Pope will be the reflection visible to all that the Sun is the Risen Christ to the globalized and chaotic world, not the Sabbath with its customs (Colossians 2:16-17) and empty arguments that have always led this same world to a sad end.

It is necessary to have faith and hope for something better for Christendom and mankind in general.

The traditional Mass will be offered in this Church, we can conclude this too, through the fidelity of the faithful even in martyrdom, if necessary; united, however, always to Peter and his legitimate successors, even though many do not accept today's evidences that demonstrate the whole truth.

Renato

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...