Skip to main content

Francis Effect: Major Synod on Synodality document highlights need to ‘welcome’ polygamists, ‘LGBTQ+ people’

Major Synod on Synodality document highlights need to ‘welcome’ polygamists, ‘LGBTQ+ people’

Comments

Anonymous said…
God called Benedict XVI, as he mentioned, to be near the cross, but still in the precincts of St. Peter. I believe it is nothing of chance, moreover when they are when it comes to things of God. It's about the gesture of the German pope keeps to himself the ministry, the múnus. And that he was prevented from reigning, and in the face of the such facts, by revealing then that only the competent cardinals, that is, chosen before 2013 have the competence to follow what the Holy Spirit true really desires of the future of Church.
Anonymous said…
They are more logical reflections in the most possible way that can be made, perhaps failing in something, but listening and seeing everyone, the most honest intellectually and aclear, and through facts like this post, mystics and prophecies, such as the warning of St. Francis of Assisi of the great tribulation that is to come before a figure "not canonically elected". We can also add the geopolitical situation of the world today and this agenda of Bergoglio in the Church that is consistent today with Davos.
Anonymous said…
God called St. Joseph, protector of the Church, also to his cross. He thus went into the wilderness in the face of Herod's threat to the Child. Not by chance, the book of Revelation puts the Church fleeing the desert too, but with wings. That is, She will be transformed, it will be free to proclaim the Gospel, in the example primitive her with signs. But it takes some time for her to condemn the world, which the last council embraced, and this agenda.
Anonymous said…
Perhaps I am wrong, but it will be a man of the desert, through this logic above, who will begin the triumph of the Church. A hermit.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...