Epoch Times: Bill Barr "decisively Interfered in the election...enabled the media’s blackout on the laptop story that had direct ramifications on the 2020 election" & "instructed prosecutors... to prevent word of investigations into Hunter Biden from becoming public"
Sasse demands Barr ‘rip up’ 2008 Epstein deal, bring co-conspirators to justice
...His dad was the Dalton School headmaster, very elite school, the current SecState went there. The last thing Barr's dad did before stepping down to write science fiction books that glorified underage sexual assault was to recommend Jeffrey Epstein to be a math teacher at the Dalton School. Barr was the only son of a wealthy family on the Upper West Side. He's one of those nerds who played the tuba. Goes on to get his political pedigree through the Bush family, worked for Poppy Bush at the CIA hiding all the evidence from the Church Committee about CIA misconduct and malfeasance. Bush brought Barr into the Justice Department when Bush became VP. Barr and Mueller then buried everything about Bush's connections to Manuel Noriega--all the drug running, money laundering, arms running, all kinds of illicit activity. We used Noriega as our guy going back to the 70s.
That's who Barr is. He suckered his way into the Trump administration by promising to end the Mueller investigation. [Suckered me.] That involved multiple levels of irony because Barr and Mueller go way back, but Mueller was at the end of his rope--they had no proof, but Mueller’s investigation had served its purpose to cover up the criminality of the Deep State in the initial spying on Trump. Barr used that as a perfect controlled opposition move. It was under Barr that Jeffrey Epstein died--Eternal Truth #1, Jeffrey Epstein did not kill himself. It was also under Barr that all the election issues happened, and he claimed there was no problem. And now we know that it was Barr who buried all the Biden corruption evidence since 2017. It's not a coincidence that the centerpiece of the Biden family corruption--although it extends elsewhere geographically--was Ukraine.
As you look at those combined issues, Trump was the main obstacle all along and he remains the main obstacle. Barr, by "predicting" a federal indictment of Trump, was actually calling for the federal indictment that crossed the Rubicon [i.e., involving Deep State lawfare in electoral politics]. Jack Smith is close to the International Criminal Court--those aren't your great human rights advocates. Smith is a political hitman. If he's assigned a case, he brings an indictment, regardless of the evidence. He was involved in the John Edwards prosecution [outrageously flawed legal theory], similarly when he went after the VA governor on a bogus RICO theory--lost both cases, the VA case unanimously at the SCOTUS. Smith isn't known as a legal heavyweight--he's known as a Deep State affiliated hitman who will bring an indictment if he's assigned a case....
Barr also ran cover for the FBI assassination of a mother holding her infant (not a weapon) on the scene of an FBI raid which was based on an FBI setup. He not a good man. - Dad 29 [https://dad29.blogspot.com/2023/06/bluto-barrs-real-bio.html]
Barr - The Ultimate Traitor - The Donald - America First!
Trump ex-Attorney General Bill Barr defends FBI search of Mar-a-Lago
The Epoch Times reported on how the FBI lies and Bill Barr’s silence "decisively interfered in the election" and undermined the national security:
During his recent interview, Barr conceded that he knew that letter from our nation’s intelligence officials “was baseless” and that he believed Biden himself fully understood that it “was a lie.” Unlike Trump, Biden was citing published claims by intelligence officials that Barr now says he knew to be inaccurate at the time those claims were made. But, in contrast to his earlier actions regarding Trump’s tweets, Barr chose to stay silent on Biden’s claims.
In doing so, Barr decisively interfered in the election through his inaction.
The sharply differing stances that Barr took in those months preceding the 2020 presidential election are puzzlingly contradictory. Barr apparently felt that it was necessary to make sure that U.S. citizens were aware that Biden wasn’t under investigation as a part of Durham’s probe, but he didn’t feel it was important to counter a false narrative from former intelligence officials, including four CIA directors, that Barr knew to be untrue.
At the time of that second presidential debate, the FBI already had Hunter’s laptop in its possession—and had held the device for 10 months. The FBI had also opened an investigation into Hunter Biden for multiple offenses—including allegations of money laundering and possible violations of the Foreign Agents Registration Act. Hunter’s laptop contained emails and other information that were directly connected to these allegations.
Barr’s differing treatment of Biden and Trump leaves many questions unanswered. Although many in the media, along with then-Biden spokeswoman Jen Psaki, have asserted that Hunter is a private citizen who wasn’t running for office, Hunter’s laptop directly implicated Joe Biden in a number of dubious foreign dealings. Biden repeatedly lied about these matters while on the campaign trail.
In one particularly notable instance, Biden had personally met with Hunter’s Ukrainian business partner only a few months before that same partner demanded that Hunter end the investigations into Burisma, the Ukrainian energy firm that was paying Hunter $1 million per year. On the campaign trail, Biden declared that he had never talked to his son about his foreign business dealings.
Not only did Barr choose to remain silent about Hunter’s laptop, but he had also, in fact, “instructed prosecutors and senior colleagues to prevent word of investigations into Hunter Biden from becoming public and keep the Justice Department out of campaign politics,” according to sources cited by The Wall Street Journal.
As we now know, Hunter’s emails and laptop are real. Indeed, shortly after the election, Hunter Biden suddenly released a statement acknowledging that he was under federal investigation.
The silence from Barr enabled the media’s blackout on the laptop story that had direct ramifications on the 2020 election. A poll by Media Research showed that 45 percent of the Biden voters were unaware of the allegations against Hunter and Joe Biden and that 16 percent of Biden voters–well over the margin of victory–wouldn’t have voted for him had they known this crucial information.
In 2016, the Hillary Clinton campaign accused Russia of trying to help elect Trump. Then-CIA Director John Brennan played an important role in advancing the Clinton campaign’s narrative. In an eerie parallel to those events, the Biden campaign, again with the help of Brennan and other intelligence officials, falsely accused Russia of trying to help elect Trump in 2020.
Barr argues in his book that Trump’s claims about Biden required Barr to insert himself because he didn’t want a repeat of the Russia collusion claims that plagued the 2016 election; that same argument, however, should have required Barr to speak out on Biden’s debate claims that Hunter’s laptop was a Russian plot.
If Barr was truly concerned about a potential repeat of the 2016 election, it would have been incumbent on him to step forward publicly as soon as Biden made his false accusations against Russia, particularly given the involvement of Brennan, who was himself entangled in the 2016 election interference.
The national security implications from Biden’s repeated invocations of Russia is another important factor that should have required Barr to act. [https://www.theepochtimes.com/how-bill-barrs-silence-impacted-the-outcome-of-an-election_4357067.html]
Moreover, in 2021, Gateway Pundit reported that, Donald Trump's apparent controlled opposition, former Attorney General Bill Barr told "Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer to Stop Looking Into Truck Driver Jesse Morgan’s Testimony That He Moved More Than 200,000 Fraudulent Ballots from NY to PA Before the 2020 Election." [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/ag-barr-told-lt-col-tony-shaffer-stop-looking-truck-driver-jesse-morgans-testimony-moved-200000-fraudulent-ballots-ny-pa-2020-election/] Traitorous
Here are some headlines indicating that Barr may be controlled opposition for the FBI and the Joe Biden Deep State team:
Epoch Times: Barr was Appointed "to Reassure...Rule of Law still ...
The Foreign Policy Ramifications of Hunter's Emails - The Epoch Times
Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis's Amoris Laetitia.
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Kingdom of the Sacred Heart and the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
Stop for a moment of silence, ask Jesus Christ what He wants you to do now and next. In this silence remember God, Father, Son and Holy Ghost - Three Divine Persons yet One God, has an ordered universe where you can know truth and falsehood as well as never forget that He wants you to have eternal happiness with Him as his son or daughter by grace. Make this a practice. By doing this you are doing more good than reading anything here or anywhere else on the Internet.
Francis Notes:
- Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales totally confirmed beyond any doubt the possibility of a heretical pope and what must be done by the Church in such a situation:
"[T]he Pope... WHEN he is EXPLICITLY a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church, and the Church MUST either deprive him, or, as some say, declare him deprived, of his Apostolic See."
(The Catholic Controversy, by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)
Saint Robert Bellarmine, also, said "the Pope heretic is not deposed ipso facto, but must be declared deposed by the Church."
[https://archive.org/stream/SilveiraImplicationsOfNewMissaeAndHereticPopes/Silveira%20Implications%20of%20New%20Missae%20and%20Heretic%20Popes_djvu.txt]
- "If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2020/12/if-francis-is-heretic-what-should.html
- "Could Francis be a Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?": http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2019/03/could-francis-be-antipope-even-though.html
- If Francis betrays Benedict XVI & the"Roman Rite Communities" like he betrayed the Chinese Catholics we must respond like St. Athanasius, the Saintly English Bishop Robert Grosseteste & "Eminent Canonists and Theologians" by "Resist[ing]" him: https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/12/if-francis-betrays-benedict-xvi.html
- LifeSiteNews, "Confusion explodes as Pope Francis throws magisterial weight behind communion for adulterers," December 4, 2017:
The AAS guidelines explicitly allows "sexually active adulterous couples facing 'complex circumstances' to 'access the sacraments of Reconciliation and the Eucharist.'"
- On February 2018, in Rorate Caeli, Catholic theologian Dr. John Lamont:
"The AAS statement... establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris Laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense."
- On December 2, 2017, Bishop Rene Gracida:
"Francis' heterodoxy is now official. He has published his letter to the Argentina bishops in Acta Apostlica Series making those letters magisterial documents."
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church by the bishops by the grace of God.
Election Notes:
- Intel Cryptanalyst-Mathematician on Biden Steal: "212Million Registered Voters & 66.2% Voting,140.344 M Voted...Trump got 74 M, that leaves only 66.344 M for Biden" [http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/intel-cryptanalyst-mathematician-on.html?m=1]
- Will US be Venezuela?: Ex-CIA Official told Epoch Times "Chávez started to Focus on [Smartmatic] Voting Machines to Ensure Victory as early as 2003": http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2020/12/will-us-be-venezuela-ex-cia-official.html
http://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2021/01/a-hour-which-will-live-in-infamy-1001pm.html?m=1
http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/2021/01/epoch-times-show-crossroads-on-capital.html?m=1]
Comments