The Nuremberg Trial-like Excuse which Cardinal Burke has so Staggeringly, so Stereotypically Proffered on the Promised “Formal Correction”
Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an antipope? On at least five occasions, Cardinal Burke has rejected the magisterial nature of official papal teaching (in one case, pre-emptively dismissing a hypothetical official teaching of the Magisterium): Cardinal Burke has rejected the official teaching of Pope Francis in the new Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio concerning the possibility that a pope can raise the final synodal document to the level of ordinary magisterium, if the pope chooses. (We covered the Episcopalis Communio here .) The whole apostolic constitution on the Synod is problematic. … This idea that either the Pope on his own or the Synod together with the Pope can create some new Magisterium [i.e. a new teaching of the ordinary Magisterium], is simply false. The Synod is a consultative body, to help the Pope to see how best to present the Church’s teaching in time. It’s not able to create ordinary Magisterium. As a canon lawyer, Cardinal Burk
"A single plane, coming from the east, launches something into the sea. Then the waters rise as high as a tower and fall. Everything is flooded. There is an earthquake. The south of England is swallowed by the waters. Three great cities will be ruined: one will be destroyed by the waters, the second is located at such a high point of the sea that you can see only the church tower and the third sinking".
Consequently, Aleksey Zhuravlyov, chairman of the Russian nationalist political party Rodina, threatened England. If this politician says this it is because he had information from the Russian government.
They, therefore, should have stopped this madness in Ukraine sooner. All of them, both atlancicists and Eurasians, through a peace treaty.