"If Francis IS a Valid and Licit Pope ... then we have a Problem" & "If he's an Antipope, there is Nothing Good that can possibly come from this Consecration; even if it *Appears* to be Good"
The popular Twitter pundit D.E. Meikle said in The Catholic Monitor comment section "If Francis IS a valid and licit pope... then we have a problem" and the well known commenter Aqua said " if he's an antipope, there is nothing good that can possibly come from this consecration; even if it *appears* to be good." Here are their CM comment posts:
Well maybe this will be our moment of sign, but perhaps it will work out differently than many think:
1) If Francis IS a valid and licit pope (issues where there are real dubia) then we have a problem. A resulting supernatural Grace from this consecration would be seen by many as validation of his papacy. Francis is an open collaborator with the ideas of the “World Economic Forum” and the globalist “New World Order”(WEF/NOW). If Francis' telos is correct, then the previous Faith of 2,000 years will have been shown to have been false, they cannot both be true (law of non-contradiction); or
2) If Francis is NOT valid/licit and he attempts this consecration he does so without juridic authority. Which means he invites some pretty nasty stuff demon-wise upon himself and those in union with him. Catholic blogger Ann Barnhardt thinks may cause a nuke war. (I don’t agree- I think if the public Francis consecration does not help resolve things, it will cause a loss of faith in Fatima (and its real message which has never been properly distributed)).
Interesting times. Pray for the Ukraine, and pray that the Consecration of Russia happens as Our Lady directs and God wills, however that may come about. if Benedict is not publicly involved, I question the whole event next week [https://www.thecatholicmonitor.com/2022/03/would-consecration-of-russia-to-marys.html]