Do the Corporate & China Elite behind the Vaccine Mandates want to create more Propaganda & Police States Like Australia?
In remembering a clip from C-SPAN, I found it amusing that a Catholic news outlet whose name will not be mentioned was spreading misinformation on Archbishop Carlo Vigano claiming he was into "conspiracy theories" for presenting evidence on the leftist Francis's unseemly doings. He also has recently been putting the spotlight on the COVID and the abortion-tainted vaccines promotion of Francis:
Australia is undoubtedly a democracy, with multiple political parties, regular elections, and the peaceful transfer of power. But if a country indefinitely forbids its own citizens from leaving its borders, strands tens of thousands of its citizens abroad, puts strict rules on intrastate travel, prohibits citizens from leaving home without an excuse from an official government list, mandates masks even when people are outdoors and socially distanced, deploys the military to enforce those rules, bans protest, and arrests and fines dissenters, is that country still a liberal democracy?
Enduring rules of that sort would certainly render a country a police state. - The AtlanticLifeSiteNews reported that Dr. Robert Malone, who is the original inventor of the mRNA vaccine, said in an interview that the "expansion of global tyranny" by the corporate globalist elite is "alarm[ing] for hi[m] and for the "archbishop [Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò]... this pool of capital is so large now that it has more power than individual nation states... it can dictate policy, economic policy and national policy in different nation states. And that capital has acquired all of the main media, all of the Big Tech and all of the major vaccine and pharmaceutical companies":
“I’ve become convinced that we do have a situation that is essentially the growth and expansion of global tyranny that is harmonized, that is managed, that is aligned across nation states, and it appears to be aligned with the economic interests of a small cluster of investment funds that represents the bulk of global western capital,” he said. “And what I’m particularly alarmed about – me and many others, and apparently also the archbishop [Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò] – is that this pool of capital is so large now that it has more power than individual nation states do.” This capital has become so powerful that “it can dictate policy, economic policy and national policy in different nation states. And that capital has acquired all of the main media, all of the Big Tech and all of the major vaccine and pharmaceutical companies. And it’s all this is why it’s acting globally in an integrated fashion.” [https://abyssum.org/2021/12/09/ive-become-convinced-that-we-do-have-a-situation-that-is-essentially-the-growth-and-expansion-of-global-tyranny-that-is-harmonized-that-is-managed-that-is-aligned-across-natio/]
Even the liberal pro-vaccine Atlantic admitted that Australia is looking like a "police state":
Australia is undoubtedly a democracy, with multiple political parties, regular elections, and the peaceful transfer of power. But if a country indefinitely forbids its own citizens from leaving its borders, strands tens of thousands of its citizens abroad, puts strict rules on intrastate travel, prohibits citizens from leaving home without an excuse from an official government list, mandates masks even when people are outdoors and socially distanced, deploys the military to enforce those rules, bans protest, and arrests and fines dissenters, is that country still a liberal democracy?
Enduring rules of that sort would certainly render a country a police state. [https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/09/pandemic-australia-still-liberal-democracy/619940/]The reason this appears to be happening may be because the corporate elite and their ally totalitarian China are using their "capital" to make a "integrated" propaganda using their media, Big Tech and so-called objective science as illustrated by the corporate backed and Chinese friendly ScienceDirect global website that has"access to a large bibliographic database of scientific and medical publications ... It hosts over 18 million pieces of content from more than 4,000 academic journals and 30,000 e-books of this publisher" according to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ScienceDirect):
Arriving in this world, COVID-19 added new drivers that have already started to reshape and reinforce emergent trends in global geographies of wealth and power. A number of mechanisms are involved. Addressing a pandemic requires first of all effective governance, with responses revealing a great deal about the priorities, strengths and weaknesses of national governance systems (Wallis & Zhuo, 2020). China prioritized human life over economic considerations: ‘life is of paramount importance’ as Xi Jinping said on 25th January 2020.29 Countries such as China with a strong meritocratic state and strong popular support proved effective in dealing with the governance challenges involved, as also did a number of other places in East Asia. By contrast western liberal countries not only hesitated until the situation was virtually out of control but revealed weaknesses stemming from the priorities attached to private property and individualism and the erosion of national sovereignty.
Second, a pandemic is a phenomenon that does not respect national boundaries and whose prevention and control depend on a respect for science and international co-operation (rendered complicated in a post-truth social media world). [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590051X20300101#s0025]It is darkly humorous that the pro-totalitarian China ScienceDirect talks of a "post-truth social media world" when even the liberal Wikipedia admits that ScienceDirect controller and "operat[or]... the British-Dutch publisher Elsevier" apparently has a problem with truth:
In 2013, one of Elsevier's journals was caught in the sting set up by John Bohannon, published in Science, called "Who's Afraid of Peer Review?"[56] The journal Drug Invention Today accepted an obviously bogus paper made up by Bohannon that should have been rejected by any good peer-review system.[57] Instead, Drug Invention Today was among many open-access journals that accepted the fake paper for publication. As of 2014, this journal had been transferred to a different publisher.[58]
Fake journals
At a 2009 court case in Australia where Merck & Co. was being sued by a user of Vioxx, the plaintiff alleged that Merck had paid Elsevier to publish the Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine, which had the appearance of being a peer-reviewed academic journal but in fact contained only articles favourable to Merck drugs.[59][60][61][62] Merck described the journal as a "complimentary publication," denied claims that articles within it were ghost written by Merck, and stated that the articles were all reprinted from peer-reviewed medical journals.[63] In May 2009, Elsevier Health Sciences CEO Hansen released a statement regarding Australia-based sponsored journals, conceding that they were "sponsored article compilation publications, on behalf of pharmaceutical clients, that were made to look like journals and lacked the proper disclosures." The statement acknowledged that it "was an unacceptable practice."[64] The Scientist reported that, according to an Elsevier spokesperson, six sponsored publications "were put out by their Australia office and bore the Excerpta Medica imprint from 2000 to 2005," namely the Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine (Australas. J. Bone Joint Med.), the Australasian Journal of General Practice (Australas. J. Gen. Pract.), the Australasian Journal of Neurology (Australas. J. Neurol.), the Australasian Journal of Cardiology (Australas. J. Cardiol.), the Australasian Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (Australas. J. Clin. Pharm.), and the Australasian Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine (Australas. J. Cardiovasc. Med.).[65] Excerpta Medica was a "strategic medical communications agency" run by Elsevier, according to the imprint's web page.[66] In October 2010, Excerpta Medica was acquired by Adelphi Worldwide.[67]
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
There was speculation[68] that the editor-in-chief of Elsevier journal Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Mohamed El Naschie, misused his power to publish his own work without appropriate peer review. The journal had published 322 papers with El Naschie as author since 1993. The last issue of December 2008 featured five of his papers.[69] The controversy was covered extensively in blogs.[70][71] The publisher announced in January 2009 that El Naschie had retired as editor-in-chief.[72] As of November 2011 the co-Editors-in-Chief of the journal were Maurice Courbage and Paolo Grigolini.[73] In June 2011, El Naschie sued the journal Nature for libel, claiming that his reputation had been damaged by their November 2008 article about his retirement, which included statements that Nature had been unable to verify his claimed affiliations with certain international institutions.[74] The suit came to trial in November 2011 and was dismissed in July 2012, with the judge ruling that the article was "substantially true", contained "honest comment", and was "the product of responsible journalism". The judgement noted that El Naschie, who represented himself in court, had failed to provide any documentary evidence that his papers had been peer-reviewed.[75] Judge Victoria Sharp also found "reasonable and serious grounds" for suspecting that El Naschie used a range of false names to defend his editorial practice in communications with Nature, and described this behavior as "curious" and "bizarre".[76]
Plagiarism
Elsevier's 'Duties of Authors' states that authors should ensure they have written entirely original works, and that proper acknowledgement of other's work must always be given. Elsevier claims plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical behaviour.[77] Some Elsevier journals automatically screen submissions for plagiarism,[78] but not all.[79]
Albanian politician, Taulant Muka claimed that Elsevier journal Procedia had plagiarized in the abstract of one of its articles. It is unclear whether or not Muka had access to the entirety of the article.[80]
Scientific racism
Angela Saini has criticized the two Elsevier journals Intelligence and Personality and Individual Differences for having included on their editorial boards such well-known proponents of scientific racism as Richard Lynn and Gerhard Meisenberg; in response to her inquiries, Elsevier defended their presence as editors.[81] The journal Intelligence has been criticized for having "occasionally included papers with pseudoscientific findings about intelligence differences between races."[82] It is the official journal of the International Society for Intelligence Research, which organizes the controversial series of conferences London Conference on Intelligence, described by the New Statesman as a forum for scientific racism.[83]
In response to a 2019 open letter, efforts by Retraction Watch and a petition signed by over 1000 people, on 17 June 2020 Elsevier announced it was retracting an article that J. Philippe Rushton and Donald Templer published in 2012 in the Elsevier journal Personality and Individual Differences.[84] The article had claimed that there was scientific evidence that skin color was related to aggression and sexuality in humans.[85] One of their Journals, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, was involved in the manipulation of the peer review report [86]
Manipulation of bibliometrics
According to Goodhart's law and concerned academics like the signatories of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment, commercial academic publishers benefit from manipulation of bibliometrics and scientometrics like the journal impact factor, which is often used as proxy of prestige and can influence revenues, including public subsidies in the form of subscriptions and free work from academics.[87] Nine Elsevier journals, which exhibited unusual levels of self-citation, had their journal impact factor of 2019 suspended from Journal Citation Reports in 2020, a sanction which hit 34 journals in total." [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elsevier]In August, it appeared a number of media outlets such as Reuters and USA Today were attacking speculation about the strange coincidence that three presidents and others who opposed vaccine mandates had died including one by assassination. Knowing the media's misinformation tendencies it seems like a good time to look into the matter.
Do the Corporate and China elite behind the vaccine mandates want to create more police states like Australia?
Pray an Our Father now for reparation for the sins committed because of Francis's Amoris Laetitia.