Skip to main content

Rebellion at 1P5 against Francis Fan Boy Skojec

There appears to be rebellion at the One Peter Five comment section against Francis fan boy 1P5 publisher Steve Skojec's post "It’s Weird to Say It, But Pope Francis Has a Point":

 

I couldn't disagree more with your point of view, starting from the oxbow river analogy.
The traditionalists are not stuck on a river bend because they split up from the main body, rather they were cast away and relegated to a small village that is now and has been for many decades under siege by the ruling power, much like Maccabees.
Imagine spending 60 years under siege, with a very small population (compared to the ruling cultural power), standing your ground not only against the temporal powers as well as against the One who cast you way.
That is the situation the Traditionalists are facing, they can't produce anything because their main concern is keeping the walls sealed and the doors intact, or else.
Once the siege has been loosened or defeated, we'll be in for a REAL renaissance.


Avatar

There is no way to deny this. Fr. Faber said (170 years ago) that the world had become a whirlwind in his time and it is not incumbent for those in a tornado to stop it, but to find safety.

We are not in a position to reflect on new ways for the new to blend with the old organically. Both the Church and the world is moving so fast it is too hard for a human to possibly understand the complexities of how this is destroying us psychologically, spiritually and intellectually.
I do agree it would be interesting to have a Church teach how to deal with modern communications in relation to children, or how to deal with the entertainment culture.

Instead I have to deal with the Church producing a sodomite culture, with blasphemous statements and actions while the world politically is descending into Communistic chaos.
Trads are reactionary because we have no way to be in action. At this point unless there is Divine intervention we are all looking at women priests, and a complete takeover of the western world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...