Attorney Lively: "The Supreme Court will "Vindicate Trump's Victory" by "Simple Invalidation of all Ballots received after the Close of the Polls on Election Night"
"We need only establish sufficient evidence to justify an official investigation. Everyone should be familiar with this very low standard because it was used to justify the appointment of a Special Counsel to investigate President Trump in the Russian Collusion Hoax. His enemies had far less proof of criminal conspiracy (in fact zero proof) than we have now against the Democrats...investigations for criminal conspiracy usually must proceed on limited evidence because of the secretive nature of this type of crime... "
we want at this point (at the very least) is not a conviction of
individuals but the electoral equivalent of a mistrial – the legal
requirement for that being merely “serious procedural error or
misconduct” generally. That standard is met on its face in their refusal
to allow meaningful access by pro-Trump observers, in at least one case
directly defying a court order."
"... the best
outcome (which I expect to occur) would be the simple invalidation of
all ballots received after the close of the polls on election night." - Lawyer Scott Lively
Attorney, author and World Net Daily contributor Scott Lively said from a legal point of view he "expect[ed]" that the Supreme Court will "vindicate Trump's victory" by "the simple invalidation of all ballots received after the close of the polls on election night":
Why SCOTUS Will Vindicate Trump’s Victory
This brings me to the matter of Democrat-controlled states “legalizing” universal ballot mail-outs, and post-election day acceptance of ballots. I am firmly convinced that the main purpose of this change was to increase the number of “unclaimed” ballots available to be “harvested” by the Democrat voter fraud machines in the swing states.